(For the Powerpoint slide show, please scroll to the bottom of the page and click on "We Are Surrounded")

 

 

We Are Surrounded

Or, "How Well Do You Speak Chinese?"

 

By Craig Roberts

 

Sun Tzu, the ancient Chinese military philosopher who is oft quoted in our military institutions, wrote "One who is not acquainted with the designs of his neighbors should not enter into alliances with them."

            This quote surfaced in my consciousness as I walked the aisles of a new Dollar-type store yesterday, picking up items and turning them over to see where they were made. I counted 20 items, of which 19 were made in “China,” and one in Pakistan.  As a WWII baby boomer who grew up during the 50s and 60s, I could not help but shudder in the fact that I was holding items that were made by an avowed enemy, one that along with the former Soviet Union, forced me and my classmates in elementary school and junior high school to practice "Duck and Cover"and quick response to air raid sirens. In those post-war days we had a Civil Defense organization, were encouraged to prepare for a nuclear strike, build fallout shelters, and be ready in case Russia, China, or even Castro came over the horizon.  Those days have faded away, but living through the Cold War and the ever-present threat of “the bomb” will remain with us forever.

            Now there is no Civil Defense Corps, the fallout shelters are empty or used for storage, and we are told that the Soviet Union has collapsed, and the Red China is now our trading partner (and Taiwan never mentioned), and the only Barbarians at the Gate are North Korea and certain countries in the Middle East that support terrorist organizations.

            However, as a student of history, and a former intelligence analyst, I see another world growing up around us. One the media ignores, the politicians refuse to recognize, and one of which the American people remain ignorant. It is a world in which we are surrounded, being infiltrated, and readied for invasion.

            To understand what his happening today, one must understand certain military tenets of warfare. These include:

 

            Infiltrate the enemy country with advance forces and spies.

            Pre-position supplies close to the anticipated battleground.

            Destroy the enemy's will to resist.

            Destroy the enemy population’s morals and morale.

            Sew confusion among the enemy population

            Cut lines of communication

            Create diversions

            Control all information and media outlets

            Attack on many fronts

            Destroy the enemy's capability to wage war

            Reduce or destroy enemy's military bases

            Strike only when ready and when enemy is at his weakest.

 

In the intelligence world, what we do is take pieces of information, like pieces of a puzzle, and "put them on the wall and see what picture develops." Lord Wellington of Waterloo once said "I've spent my entire military career wondering what the chap on the other side of the hill was doing."  In intelligence circles, information gathering is chief among tasks, followed by "okay, what are they up to?"

Let us examine some current "intelligence indicators" and see what picture forms.

            Over the last few decades, ever since Nixon went to China in 1972 to open trade relations, we have seen the Communist Chinese grow from a third-rate military force whose strength lay only in numbers to a very modern and well-equipped force ready to do battle on a global scale.  Unlike Russia, the Chinese have done this very quietly, trying not to draw attention to their efforts, and with one goal in mind: destroy the United States and any allies.  And we have helped them toward that goal. In fact, we continue to help them every day when we buy Chinese-made products. But beyond that, let’s examine events that have strengthened China’s military endeavors while weakening ours:

            Carter signed the Canal over to Panama, and now China's "Civilian" ports company, Hutchinson-Whampoa, which has direct links to the PLAN (People's Liberation Army Navy) operates two ports, one on each end of the canal. It has been reported that Chinese males of military age disappear into the hinterlands and later surface in Mexico close to our southern border, and currently our Border Patrol has intercepted border crossers that were not only Mexican, but from all Central American Countries, Islamic groups, and China.

            Bill Clinton gave China "most favored nation" trading status, opening our market to cheap slave-labor-made goods, which also destroyed many US companies and costing us jobs by underselling the market with cheap products. At the same time we turned our back on long-time ally, Nationalist China. All of this to "appease" the Red Chinese.

            Under the Clinton administration, Loral and Hughes were allowed to sell China missile technology and guidance systems for "communications satellites." Within months we were told that China now bragged about being able to deliver a nuclear warhead to Los Angeles.

            Also under the Clinton watch, Chinese spies were discovered at Los Alamos and in other places, some of which stole nuclear secrets for the People’s Liberation Army. ("All warfare is based on deception. There is no place where espionage is not used. Offer the enemy bait to lure him" Sun Tzu)

            While all of this was happening, our southern border was being invaded by illegal aliens to the point that besides Mexicans, we have many reports of Asians, Central Americans, and Middle-easterners coming unhindered into the U.S.

            Couple this with COSCO, the China Ocean Shipping Company, which is the Merchant Marine arm of the Chinese Navy,  working hand-in-hand with Hutchinson-Whampoa in establishing a huge transshipment center in Freeport, Bahamas, just off the Florida coast. This huge complex contains some of the biggest cranes in the world, plus hundreds upon hundreds of Sealift containers the size of semi-trucks being stored there. When I see this I can’t help but think of Diego Garcia, our forward deployment base in the Pacific.

            It is well known in the military that the easiest thing to move is troops. The hardest to move is material. You can order troops to march onto a ship or airplane, but it takes forklifts, cranes and manpower to move supplies. By forward deploying your logistics you are already half a battle ahead.

            And Freeport is not the only suspect position for Chinese pre-deployment stocks. Reports have surfaced about COSCO ships unloading in Mexico and Canada, plus several ports inside the US itself. A few years back we read of a shipment in a Sealift container that came into Long Beach, California, loaded with automatic AK-47s, machine guns, grenades and explosives. We were told it was intercepted, and that it was probably being smuggled in to street gangs. We may never know of how many other shipments went undetected, and are still being smuggled in and pre-positioned. And not for street gangs!

            Add to all this the fact that our own troops have been over-extended, our military suffering a continuing "build down" by base closings, reducing the numbers of aircraft in our squadrons and ships in our fleets, and reduction of war stocks by expenditure without restocking, plus using up our reserves and national guard forces in extended overseas missions, and we have the recipe for disaster. In other words, there ain't no one home watching the chickens, and the wolf is prowling the broken fence line.

            There are those who say that China is being influenced by prosperity, and that they are reaping the rewards of capitalism, and because of this have no reason to use military might to forward Mao's version of Communism. These pie-in-the-sky wishers do not understand the Chinese. What we are really doing is financing their military buildups, technology, and monetary base. Those who have forgotten history need to be reminded that we did the same thing in the 1930s when we sold scrap metal to Japan, only to reap the whirlwind when they used our metal in the ships and planes and bombs that attacked Pearl Harbor.  Hitler's Germany also prospered from "ree trade" by using our technology in the petroleum industry to manufacture fuels and lubricants by synthetic means. Still, we continue to feed the Chinese dragon and think nothing of where our money goes when we buy those items "Made in China."

            While we are looking at the pieces of the puzzle, we also need to add the other pieces that match the tenets of war. Sun Tzu wrote that "Appraise war in terms of the fundamental factors. The first of these factors is moral influence", and also "When a leader is morally weak and his discipline not strict, when there are no consistent rules…Neighboring rulers will take advantage of this."

            We can see the moral decay of this country over the last thirty years all around us. The types of TV programs, the language on radio talk shows, the "gay pride" marches in major cities, the loss of morals in our schools, attacks on Christianity,  legal abortion--on--demand, laws that are totally contrary to what our founding fathers envisioned, courts that punish the victims more than the offenders, activist judges that legislate from the bench, removing mentions of God or the Ten Commandments from prayer and public property and public events, the bogus "war on drugs" that is actually putting more drugs on the street, church leaders that are afraid to preach anything that might offend someone, and on and on. 

            An unjust and un-moral society is one doomed to extinction. Our founding fathers knew this. History verifies it. And the Chinese study it.

            While China is ready to move on Taiwan at any time--they’ve positioned huge amphibious forces near the Straights of Formosa—and North Korea is ready to move south, the possibility also exists that an entirely different scenario will develop. (Huge tunnels are known to exist that run under the DMZ, and a military "combat town" training facility has been built that exactly depicts downtown Seoul, right down to the street address and shop signs).

 In the following scenario, the forces that now surround us "come to our rescue."

            Picture this: our military, as strapped as it is, is in Iraq, Afghanistan, and maybe in the near future, Iran. We still have troops in South Korea, Germany and other places. Our national guard and reserves have been deployed overseas. Our law enforcement personnel are stretched thin. And then a major terrorist even--or a series of the--occurs. This event could be detonation of mini-nukes in major cities, release of a biological weapon starting a pandemic, or some other major media event-type attack.

            Who do you call for help? Ghostbusters?

            The plan is to call upon the UN to provide military, humanitarian and law enforcement relief. The only army big enough to handle a country of this size, with the means to move the personnel, is Red China (backed by Russia and the former Warsaw Pact states that we have been training for such an event at Fort Polk, Louisiana under Operation Cooperative Nugget).

            Seem far-fetched? Then know this:  a few years ago I had a nephew who attended the Command and Staff College at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas. When his class graduated, a general from the Pentagon flew in to give the graduation speech. When he was introduced, it was mentioned that he was a member of the Council on Foreign Relations—whose mission in life is to develop a one world government (the New World Order) and who were the founders of the United Nations. This particular general stated in his speech that  (paraphrasing) "due to the build down of our armed forces, should we be deployed or committed on two or more fronts in the future and a major emergency occurs here, we will be forced to call upon foreign assets to police our streets."

            Foreign assets? Who could that be?

            Sun Tzu also said that "To subdue the enemy without fighting is the supreme excellence."  With no guarded borders, and no one to guard them, and an avowed enemy who tells its military daily that "our main enemy is America," I would have to submit that this country is set up for a major fall, and very soon.

            The good news is this: The Second Amendment.  The Chinese military is very frustrated in the fact that their liberal socialist lackeys in Washington have not been able to totally disarm the American people--yet.  They have, by means of Fabian Socialism (creeping) legislation, reduced our firepower by outlawing "types" of firearm--specifically those that have military application--but have not been able to register for confiscation all the guns in the country like they have in Australia, the UK and Canada.  China well knows after its failed expeditions into Vietnam and India that fighting an armed population or a guerrilla type war is not winnable unless you first have the hearts and mind--and cooperation--of the population.

            We also have another advantage, one not spoken off but still resident: Our combat veterans.  The United States has the largest pool of combat veterans in our population of any country in the world. From our Vietnam generation (who is now in their 40s and 50s and beyond) to our Desert Storm, Somalia,  and current Afghanistan and Iraq vets who are no longer serving, we have a cadre base of "trainers and leaders" second to none. When one factors this in, we have to consider that China may wait a few years for more of us to die off. But they won’t wait forever.  We are a weakened giant, one that has be subverted from within and without, and one considered ripe for the picking. They have to reduce our will to resist, plus our means of resisting before they can hope to "patrol our streets."

            While the Chinese currently are reacting to Sun Tzu’s axiom "Nothing is more difficult than the art of maneuvering for advantageous positions," I would offer another “old saying," this one derived from India: "Beware he who rides the tiger, lest he end up inside."

            Still, we are at a very dangerous juncture. We are weakened, we have been subverted, and we are surrounded. And every time we buy something made in China, we are helping the enemy.

            As the Samurai would say, often as a curse, "we are living in interesting times."

 

Additional Notes submitted by Hunter Schultz, president of the Navy League in Panama:

1) The Chinese do not "operate" the Canal.  For the record, the ACP (Panama Canal Authority) is owned by the Government of Panama. The ACP operates the Canal and employs thousands of Panamanians to operate it. Many former US Canal workers are still employed there and provide valuable perspective on the day-to-day operations.

2) The Chinese do not have total control who uses the Canal nor can it "control" Canal transits.  The Panamanian government controls who can get off a ship and where they can disembark. Stopping in the middle of the Canal doesn't work either since an ACP pilot is on board during the entire transit. The ship's captain is not in command during a transit.

3) Hutchinson Whampoa, a company based in Hong Kong, is the manager of the port facilities at either end of the Canal. They do not own the facilities.  The majority of their workforce is Panamanian. Indeed, HW has links to the Chinese Government. However, this does not mean that they are controlling the Panama Canal.

Further, the Panama Canal
Neutrality Treaty states:

"(a) AMENDMENTS

(1) At the end of Article IV, insert the following:

"A correct and authoritative statement of certain rights and duties of the Parties under the foregoing is contained in the Statement of Understanding issued by the Government of the United States of America on October 14, 1977, and by the Government of the Republic of Panama on October 18, 1977, which is hereby incorporated as an integral part of this Treaty, as follows:

```Under the Treaty Concerning the Permanent Neutrality and Operation of the Panama Canal (the Neutrality Treaty), Panama and the United States have the responsibility to assure that the Panama Canal will remain open and secure to ships of all nations. The correct interpretation of this principle is that each of the two countries shall, in accordance with their respective constitutional processes, defend the Canal against any threat to the regime of neutrality, and consequently shall have the right to act against any aggression or threat directed against the Canal or against the peaceful transit of vessels through the Canal.

```This does not mean, nor shall it be interpreted as, a right of intervention of the United States in the internal affairs of Panama. Any United States action will be directed at insuring that the Canal will remain open, secure, and accessible, and it shall never be directed against the territorial integrity or political independence of Panama.'''

(2) At the end of the first paragraph of Article VI, insert the following:

``In accordance with the Statement of Understanding mentioned in Article IV above: `The Neutrality Treaty provides that the vessels of war and auxiliary vessels of the United States and Panama will be entitled to transit the Canal expeditiously. This is intended, and it shall so be interpreted, to assure the transit of such vessels through the Canal as quickly as possible, without any impediment, with expedited treatment, and in case of need or emergency, to go to the head of the line of vessels in order to transit the Canal rapidly.'''

(b) CONDITIONS:

(1) Notwithstanding the provisions of Article V or any other provision of the Treaty, if the Canal is closed, or its operations are interfered with, the United States of America and the Republic of Panama shall each independently have the right to take such steps as each deems necessary, in accordance with its constitutional processes, including the use of military force in the Republic of Panama, to reopen the Canal or restore the operations of the Canal, as the case may be.

Hunter N. Schultz
President
Navy League - Panama

 

 

HOME

 

 Hit Counter