DEFENSE MOTION FILED BY LAWYERS FOR TERRY NICHOLS IN THE OKLAHOMA STATE COURT TRIAL
For those who have studied this case, this document reveals many incredible details that not only help "connect the dots" in many parts of the case, but reveal that the federal government does indeed have video tapes showing more than one person getting out of the Ryder truck in front of the Murrah building. This document goes into detail on the efforts of certain federal agents and prosecutors to hide the facts, hide evidence, and discredit the witnesses in this case. The Big Question that hangs over the OKBOMB case is "WHY?"
Why hide the facts...and the Others Unknown?
Read on....
Nichols Defense Motion
|
|
|
|
IN
THE DISTRICT COURT OF PITTSBURG COUNTY
STATE OF OKLAHOMA ,THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA, )
Plaintiff, )
V. ) Case No. F-2004-68
TERRY LYNN NICHOLS, )
|
|
|
|
Defendant.
)
TERRY LYNN NICHOLS' MOTION TO DISMISS BASED ON THE
STATE'S FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH BRADY v. MARYLAND
Submitted by:
Brian T. Hermanson, OBA #4131
W.
Creekmore Wallace, II, OBA #9315
Rodney J. Uphoff, OBA #014170
Barbara E. Bergman
Mark A. Earnest
Theresa M. Duncan
P.O. Box 879
McAlester, OK 74502
(918) 426-0032
Court-Appointed Attorneys for the Defendant
Table of Contents
I. STATEMENT OF FACTS 1
A. Introduction 1
B. McVeigh and Others Unknown 5
C. McVeigh and Elohim City 7
` D. McVeigh and the Midwest Bank Robbers 12
E. Frustrating the Defense Investigation 21
F. Solomon's Documents 24
G. Critical Information Contained in 1B 3484 43
H. The FBI's Investigation of the Midwest Bank Robbers
Calling Cards/Phone Records 54
I. The Federal Government's Investigation into Elohim
City 69
II. MR. NICHOLS HAS BEEN DEPRIVED OF DUE PROCESS OF
LAW
BECAUSE THE STATE HAS FAILED TO PROVIDE HIM WITH THE
EXCULPATORY MATERIAL TO WHICH HE IS CONSTITUTIONALLY ENTITLED 75
III. EVIDENCE THAT OTHERS ASSISTED TIMOTHY MCVEIGH IS
CRITICAL TO ENSURING THAT MR. NICHOLS IS PROVIDED HIS
CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO PRESENT A DEFENSE 82
I. STATEMENT OF FACTS
A. Introduction
To fully appreciate the extent to which the federal
government and the state prosecutors have sought to mislead this Court, the
defense, and the public about the bombing of the Murrah Building, it is
necessary to bear in mind a number of actions taken by the FBI, officials in the
Department of Justice, and the state prosecutors.
* First, relatively soon after the bombing, Attorney
General Janet Reno announced publicly that the bombing was an act of domestic
terrorism.
* Second, the FBI and federal prosecutors proclaimed
prior to and at the federal trials that there was no John Doe #2 or other
unnamed co-conspirators. Rather, officials of the federal government insisted
that the bombing was solely the work of Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols,
except for some early assistance by the Fortier’s.
* Third, the federal government has withheld critical
information from the defense, has sanitized or redacted 302s, and has buried
other materials in the discovery provided to the defense all in an effort to
mask the connection between Timothy McVeigh and his co-conspirators. This was
particularly easy to do given the volume of material turned over to the defense
and the roadblocks thrown up by the federal government and state prosecutors to
bar access to relevant documents and information. The state prosecutors not only
have echoed the federal government's claim that only Timothy McVeigh and Terry
Nichols committed this bombing, they have fought to prevent us from discovering
exculpatory material and the connection between McVeigh and others unknown.
Invoking their claimed "open file policy" and relying on an unduly
narrow view of their Brady obligations, state prosecutors have insisted that it
is up to the defense to search for itself in millions of documents to find
whatever exculpatory material lies hidden there.
* Fourth, the FBI kept the lead sheets from the
federal defense team and only provided a portion of them to Mr. Nichols' state
lawyers. By failing to turn over the documents and information identified in
this motion and in our last continuance motion, and by withholding the lead
sheets and other exculpatory material contained in other investigatory files
related to the Murrah Building bombing, the federal government has been largely
able to cover up the connection between Timothy McVeigh and his co-conspirators.
Indeed, it was only after the disclosures by AP reporter John Solomon and our
subsequent review of other federal investigatory files (the federal bank robbery
file of Peter Langan, one of the Midwest bank robbers1) that we discovered
critical exculpatory material buried in a 1B file in the 37 file cabinets in the
District Attorney's Office. Absent Mr. Solomon's disclosures, it is likely that
the federal government would have accomplished its goal of covering up Timothy
McVeigh's involvement with unnamed others in his plot to bomb the Murrah
Building.
State prosecutors and the Department of Justice have
repeatedly represented to this Court that the federal government and the State
have turned over to the defense all exculpatory material related to the
investigation of the bombing of the Murrah Building on April 19, 1995. Indeed,
on March 1, 2004, state prosecutors once again assured this Court that all
exculpatory material in their possession and in the possession of federal
authorities had been fully disclosed to the defense. They made this
representation even though this Court had made it perfectly clear that it wanted
to know "if you or the federal government have any hint, any indication,
direct or indirect, that anybody in any of those groups played a role in the
bombing of the Murrah Building."2 This Court, relying upon the
representations made by the State and the Department of Justice, denied Mr.
Nichols' Motion for Continuance.3 This Court made it perfectly clear, however,
that if that reliance proved to be misplaced and it was discovered that any
exculpatory material had not been disclosed to the defense, the remedy would not
be a mistrial, it would be dismissal with prejudice.
Put bluntly, this Court has been misled. The federal
government and state prosecutors have withheld -- and continue to withhold --
critical information from the defense that shows that Timothy McVeigh was aided
by persons other than Terry Nichols in his plot to bomb the Murrah Building.
Indeed, they have withheld from the defense and from this Court the fact that
they have a video in their possession showing "the suspects" exiting
the Ryder truck three minutes and six seconds before the detonation. They have
also failed to disclose the critical fact that Timothy McVeigh made a second
phone call to Elohim City after he rented the Ryder truck. This omission is
particularly significant in light of additional evidence we have now uncovered
that Mr. McVeigh's call on April 5, 1995, to Elohim City was made on "[a]
day that he was believed to have been attempting to recruit a second conspirator
to assist in the OKBOMB4 attack."5
As this Motion and our last Motion for Continuance
spell out, the federal government and state prosecutors have deliberately
frustrated our efforts to link Mr. McVeigh with the Midwest bank robbers and
with terrorists living in Elohim City.6 It was not until the disclosures made by
AP reporter, John Solomon, in his February 25, 2004 article and our subsequent
investigation, however, that we found more information that now allows us to
fully appreciate the extent of the connection between Mr. McVeigh and these
others. In fact, the additional investigation we have conducted since March 1,
2004, together with the documents and information set forth in our Motion for
Continuance, unequivocally demonstrate that Timothy McVeigh was aided by persons
other than Terry Nichols in his plot to bomb the Murrah Building.
Moreover, significant circumstantial evidence points
to the conclusion that those who aided Timothy McVeigh were members of a violent
gang of bank robbers known as the Midwest bank robbers and to people living in
Elohim City, a communal compound of anti-government violent radicals located in
northeastern Oklahoma. As this Motion demonstrates, however, the federal
government and state prosecutors have withheld much of this exculpatory
information while other exculpatory material lay buried --- and more may still
be buried -- in the voluminous files in the District Attorney's Office. The
evidence withheld from the defense coupled with the evidence we have now
discovered following Mr. Solomon's revelations directly substantiates Mr.
Nichols' defense: Mr. McVeigh was aided by others and he manipulated Mr. Nichols
to take the blame instead of these others. Because the federal government and
the state prosecutors have misled this Court and have done so in a way that
denies Mr. Nichols' his right to a fair trial, we now request the remedy that
this Court promised - dismissal of this case with prejudice.
B. McVeigh and Others Unknown
When we began to review the 302s provided to us by the
State, it became clear that there were numerous sightings of Timothy McVeigh in
the company of other persons in Oklahoma City and in Kansas in the weeks and
days before April 19, 1995. These sightings did not involve Terry Nichols.
Rather, numerous witnesses identified a person or persons with Mr. McVeigh at
times when Terry Nichols was clearly not present or described the accomplices
with Mr. McVeigh in a manner that was totally inconsistent with Terry Nichols.7
In addition, there were frequent reports of persons driving the yellow Mercury
Marquis owned by Mr. McVeigh or being seen riding in that Mercury either on
April 19th or in the days before the bombing.8 There were also sightings of
McVeigh and another person near the Murrah Building before and after the
bombing.9 The information provided by these witnesses confirmed the existence of
another person or persons aiding Mr. McVeigh. Once again, most of these
sightings were at times that eliminated Terry Nichols as Mr. McVeigh's
accomplice.
In addition, there were 302s that related sightings of
Mr. McVeigh and another person or persons in a Ryder truck either on April 19th
or before the bombing.10 Moreover, there were witnesses who clearly put another
person with Mr. McVeigh when the Ryder truck was rented.11 Finally, there was
considerable evidence that pointed to others unknown being with McVeigh at the
Dreamland Motel in Junction City, Kansas in the days before the bombing.
Specifically, Lea McGown, the owner of the Dreamland Motel, heard male voices,
at least two and possibly three, coming from Room #25, McVeigh's room, at the
Dreamland on either Saturday evening, April 15, 1995, or Sunday evening April
16, 1995.12 In addition, Jeff Davis from the Hunam Palace restaurant delivered
an order to that same room on the evening of Saturday, April 15. He has
previously testified that the man who came to the door to take the order was not
Timothy McVeigh.13 Indeed, the calls made from Room #25 to order the Chinese
food and to check on its delivery were made without using the Daryl Bridges
calling card, suggesting that they were made by someone other than Timothy
McVeigh who regularly used the Bridges card for local calls.14 All of this
evidence points to the conclusion that a person or persons other than Terry
Nichols assisted Mr. McVeigh in his plot to blow up the Murrah Building.
In the early months of 2001, therefore, the defense
began to interview a number of these witnesses. Given the length of time that
had passed, the defense had to spend hundreds of hours trying to locate these
witnesses. What the defense learned, however, when a number of these witnesses
were finally interviewed, was that many of these witnesses were confident that
they had, in fact, seen Timothy McVeigh in or around Oklahoma City or in Kansas
at relevant times in 1994-95. Based on the growing number of credible sightings,
the defense undertook the significant challenge of trying to determine the
identity of the person or persons who were assisting Mr. McVeigh.
C. McVeigh and Elohim City
The 302s provided to us by the State occasionally
referenced persons connected to Elohim City, a communal compound located in
northeastern Oklahoma near the city of Muldrow. The State disclosed in the
materials turned over to us the fact that Timothy McVeigh, using the Daryl
Bridges calling card, called Elohim City on April 5, 1995, two weeks before the
bombing. He asked to speak to an individual named Andy Strassmeir. See Trial
Transcript, United States v. Nichols, December 10, 1997, at 13718. Minutes later
Mr. McVeigh used that same Bridges card to make a call to a Ryder truck rental
store in Arizona. See State's Exhibit 553, p. 189. Nevertheless, the federal
government and the state prosecutors have steadfastly denied any connection
between Timothy McVeigh and Elohim City. Not surprisingly then, most of the
information that we were able to obtain about Elohim City did not come from the
302s or the federal government, but from the state grand jury, from a motion
filed by the defense in the McVeigh case, and from our own investigation.
From these sources we learned that a number of the
residents of the Elohim City compound had long been known to both local and
national law enforcement authorities for advocating violence and the overthrow
of the government. In 1994 and 1995, the Reverend Robert Millar was the leader
of Elohim City. The residents of Elohim City practiced a religion known as
Christian Identity that promoted white supremacy. In 1994 and 1995, before the
bombing of the Murrah Building, a number of well-known anti-government persons
either lived in or passed through Elohim City, including Jim Ellison. Mr.
Ellison was Reverend Millar's son-in-law, and former head of the Arkansas wing
of a paramilitary anti-government group, the Covenant, Sword and Arm of the Lord
("CSA"). In 1983, members of this compound conspired with Richard
Wayne Snell, another member of the CSA, to blow up the Murrah Building.15 Snell
was later executed on April 19, 1995, by the State of Arkansas for killing a
state trooper. He was buried in Elohim City. Media reports suggested a
connection between Snell's execution and the Murrah Building bombing because
Snell was alleged to have said shortly before his execution: "Governor,
look over your shoulder, justice is coming."
We discovered that in the fall of 1994 the ATF began
to investigate a person by the name of Dennis Mahon.16 Mr. Mahon was a leader of
an organization called WAR (White Aryan Resistance). Not only was Mr. Mahon an
avowed racist, but he was also a sworn enemy of the United States government who
approved of the use of violence against the government. At one time, Mahon was
also leader of the Oklahoma chapter of the Ku Klux Klan. In the fall of 1994,
Mahon was a frequent visitor to Elohim City and a close friend of Andreas
Strassmeir.
As part of their investigation into the activities in
Elohim City, the ATF utilized a confidential informant to obtain information.
The ATF later disclosed that the confidential informant was a woman named Carol
Howe. While working as an informant, Ms. Howe spent time at Elohim City in 1994
and through April of 1995. Ms. Howe would report what she saw and heard about
the activities at Elohim City to her ATF "handler," Special Agent
Angela Finley-Graham.
Carol Howe reported to Agent Finley-Graham about the
increasing militancy of those in Elohim City. She told Finley-Graham that Mahon
and Strassmeir had discussed "targeting" federal installations for
destruction, such as the Tulsa IRS Office, the Tulsa Federal Building and the
Oklahoma City Federal Building. In fact, Mahon not only discussed the
destruction of the Federal Building in Oklahoma City by bombing, but Mahon and
Strassmeir took at least three trips to Oklahoma City in November 1994, December
1994, and again in February 1995. In fact, Carol Howe claims to have accompanied
them during the December 1994 trip. See E-427, attached as Exhibit 2.
Carol Howe later testified at Mr. Nichols' federal
trial and at the state grand jury investigating the Murrah Building bombing. She
stated that following the Oklahoma City bombing she saw pictures of Timothy
McVeigh in the media and realized that she had seen McVeigh in Elohim City. He
was with Andreas Strassmeir. Ms. Howe believes that she saw McVeigh sometime
around July 1994.17 He was using the alias of "Tim Tuttle."
Ultimately, however, other than Carol Howe's testimony and evidence of Mr.
McVeigh's April 5, 1995 phone call we could find little corroboration of this
linkage between Mr. McVeigh and Elohim City.18
There is no doubt that Andreas Strassmeir was living
in Elohim City in 1994 and until August of 1995. In fact, Mr. Strassmeir, a
German national, was the security director at the Elohim City compound. On
February 28, 1992, State Highway Trooper Vernon Phillips had stopped Strassmeir
near Elohim City and searched his car finding a copy of The Terrorist
Handbook.19 See E-427.20 Strassmeir was not only familiar with bomb making and
weaponry, he organized paramilitary training sessions at Elohim City and
regularly discussed taking direct action against the federal government. See
id.; E-1866. After the bombing of the Murrah Building, Strassmeir admitted
meeting Timothy McVeigh at a gun show in Tulsa in 1993 and discussing Waco with
him. See D-14897. Furthermore, Mr. Strassmeir has been linked with several of
the Midwest bank robbers and supposedly trained some of the robbers at Elohim
City. See D-16207. In fact, he roomed for a while with Michael Brescia, one of
the Midwest bank robbers. Strassmeir was in this country illegally on an expired
visa on April 19, 1995.
On April 5, 1995, the same day that McVeigh was
calling Strassmeir, the telephone records prepared by the FBI reveal that nine
calls were placed by Timothy McVeigh to the National Alliance.21 The National
Alliance is a neo-Nazi group that was founded by Richard Butler, the author of
The Turner Diaries and The Hunter.22 See Exhibit 3, attached pamphlet entitled:
"What is the National Alliance?" As that brochure demonstrates, the
National Alliance is a hate group that preaches the superiority of the Aryan
race and the need for a regime change in the United States. Undoubtedly, Timothy
McVeigh firmly believed in the ideas espoused in The Hunter and The Turner
Diaries and was sympathetic to the ideology of white supremacist organizations.
In contrast, there is no evidence that Terry Nichols was a member of any white
supremacist group. Indeed, Terry Nichols' marriage to a non-Aryan Filipino,
Marife Nichols, is wholly inconsistent with the tenets of the National Alliance.
The National Alliance and other Aryan hate groups are fundamentally opposed to
interracial marriage. Exhibit 3 (the National Alliance pamphlet) sets forth the
requirements for membership in the organization and makes clear that interracial
couples and children will not be tolerated. It states:
Requirements for Membership: Ineligible persons:
"No homosexual or bisexual person, no person actively addicted to alcohol
or an illegal drug, no person with a non-White spouse or a non-White dependent,
and except, in extraordinary circumstances, no person currently confined in a
penal institution may be a member.
See also The Hunter (a novel about a man who kills
mixed-race couples to incite a race war).
Nevertheless, prior to Mr. Solomon's revelations and
our subsequent discovery of 1B3484,23 the defense did not make any significant
progress in proving that Timothy McVeigh was, in fact, working with the people
in Elohim City. Although the defense did spend considerable time trying to
locate Ms. Howe, we have only been able to talk to her father and to her lawyer.
They would not divulge her location so we have been unable to talk with her.
Moreover, the defense believes that Andreas Strassmeir is out of the country.
Consequently, we have been unable to talk to him about this case. Even if we
were able to locate him, it is unrealistic to believe that Strassmeir or any of
the residents of Elohim City would admit to the defense that they were involved
with Mr. McVeigh or identify others who might have helped him.
D. McVeigh and the Midwest Bank Robbers
In our investigation, the defense learned of a claimed
a link between Timothy McVeigh and members of a group of bank robbers known as
the "Midwest Bank Robbers" (a.k.a., the Aryan Republican Army ("ARA")).
The ARA was a group of bank robbers who committed twenty-two (22) bank robberies
in states throughout the Midwest between October 1993 and December 1995. Law
enforcement officials estimated that they netted over $250,000 from these
robberies. The ARA was a militant, anti-government group who advocated
"war" with the government. They used bombs during their robberies and
in a mission statement clearly stated that the proceeds of the robberies were to
be used to fund other acts of terrorism against the government.24 A homemade
underground video, made by the members of the ARA and confiscated by the FBI
during its investigation of the ARA, specifically references violence to
government entities and preparing for a "court house massacre." The
defense has obtained a copy of this video from journalist J.D. Cash. It is
attached as Exhibit 4.
The known members of the ARA include the following
persons: Peter Langan, Richard Guthrie, Jr., Kevin McCarthy, Scott Stedeford,
Michael Brescia and Mark Thomas. Most, if not all of them, either lived in or
visited Elohim City at some time before the Oklahoma City bombing.25 The
following short biographies of these individuals will adequately describe them
for purposes of this Motion:
a. Richard Guthrie, Jr.
Richard Guthrie was apprehended on January 15, 1996,
in Cincinnati, Ohio. He was the first of the ARA members to be arrested. At some
point following his arrest, he decided to cooperate with federal authorities in
the prosecution of the other bank robbers. He was "debriefed" by
federal investigators in March of 1996. He was purportedly offered a plea
agreement that would have resulted in a sentence of up to twenty-five years
imprisonment. On July 12, 1996, before his guilty plea and a week before he was
scheduled to testify against his co-defendant, Peter Langan, Guthrie committed
suicide in his jail cell in Covington, Kentucky.
b. Peter Langan
Peter Langan was arrested by federal law enforcement
authorities in Columbus, Ohio, on January 18, 1996, three days after Guthrie was
arrested. He was originally indicted for assault of on a federal agent and
weapons charges. In March 1996, however, Mr. Langan was charged in a superseding
indictment with two counts of bank robbery and additional weapons charges.26
During plea discussions, the federal prosecutors proposed a plea agreement that
would have required Mr. Langan to be debriefed. Federal prosecutors advised Mr.
Langan's defense counsel that he could assist himself by providing substantial
assistance in other criminal investigations. Government counsel also advised
defense counsel that they thought Mr. Langan could assist them with respect to
the Oklahoma City bombing investigation. Ultimately, no plea agreement was ever
reached. See Affidavit of Kevin Durkin, attached as Exhibit 5. As a result that
information was never provided, and Mr. Langan proceeded to trial. In two
separate trials he was convicted on 9 out of 12 charges including assault on a
federal agent, two counts of bank robbery with a firearm and a bomb, and various
other weapons charges. On December 18, 1998, Mr. Langan was sentenced to life
imprisonment without parole plus 35 years. At the time of his arrest on January
18, 1996, Mr. Langan had in his possession several prepaid calling cards
including three with the brand name "Driveline." These were prepaid
calling cards issued by Fone America, Inc. (Exhibit 6, 302 dated 1/18/96, FBI
file # 91A-CI-63809, MC-124). This 302 was not produced to the defense by the
federal government or state prosecutors in this case. Rather, it was found in
Langan's BOMBROB27 file.
c. Kevin McCarthy
Kevin McCarthy was arrested on May 24, 1996. He was
indicted in federal court on six counts of bank robbery on January 30, 1997.
After testifying for the federal government in the trials of Langan and
Stedeford, he plead guilty to one count each of bank robbery, possession of a
weapon during a criminal act, and conspiracy to commit armed robbery. Other
charges involving alleged RICO violations were dismissed. He was sentenced to
five years in prison and was placed in the federal witness protection program.
At various times during 1994 and 1995, McCarthy lived in Elohim City.
d. Scott Stedeford
Scott Stedeford was arrested on May 22, 1996.
Approximately six months later, he was found guilty in a jury trial in U.S.
District Court in Iowa of three charges related to the 1995 robbery of an Iowa
Boatman's Bank. On February 7, 1997, Stedeford was sentenced to 20 years in
prison. He also pled guilty in the U.S. District Court in Philadelphia to
conspiracy in six other bank robberies, and he received an additional 12 years.
At various times in 1994 and 1995, Mr. Stedeford lived at Elohim City and was
present at the compound the week before the Murrah Building bombing.28
e. Michael Brescia
Michael Brescia was arrested on January 30, 1997, on
charges of conspiracy to commit seven of the Midwest Bank robberies. On May 30,
1997, Brescia pled guilty to robbing the Bank One in Madison, Wisconsin. He was
sentenced to fifty-seven months in prison and was released early in March 2001.
Brescia also had lived in Elohim City and at one point was engaged to the grand
daughter of Robert Millar, the leader of the compound.
On July 2, 1996, six months before he was arrested on
charges related to the bank robberies he committed in 1995, Brescia was
contacted by telephone concerning his knowledge of Timothy McVeigh and the
Oklahoma City bombing. See E-8564. At that time, he told the FBI he would not be
interviewed outside the presence of his attorney, Kirk Lyons. Mr. Lyons was also
the attorney for Andreas Strassmeir. Brescia told the FBI that he had been told
that Timothy McVeigh had called Elohim City looking for Strassmeir.
f. Mark Thomas
Mark Thomas was arrested at his farm located in
eastern Pennsylvania on January 30, 1997. On March 19, 1998, he pled guilty to
plotting seven Midwestern bank robberies and using the cash to further the cause
of the white supremacy movement. He was sentenced to eight years in prison. He
was recently released into a work release program in January of this year. On
April 5, 1997, his former girlfriend, Donna Mazaroff, was interviewed by an FBI
agent in Alburtis, Pennsylvania. She stated that in late 1994 or early 1995, in
a moment of intense anger, Thomas made a remark to the effect: "We are
going to get them. We are going to hit one of their buildings, a Federal
building, during the day. That's when there will be the most casualties. They
will know what it is to lose their loved one, how it feels." See Exhibit 7
(302 # 17778).
In the discovery material provided to us by the State,
we have found no mention specifically of the Midwest bank robbers. We did
receive a few lab reports included in a group of over five hundred lab reports
turned over to us in this case that are connected to bank robbery investigations
that we now know were committed by members of the Midwest bank robbers gang. See
attached Exhibits 8 and 9.29 Although one of these lab reports does refer to a
bank robbery, there is no way from reading this lab report in isolation that one
is able to connect it with the Midwest bank robbers gang. The other two lab
reports contain only case numbers without any specific reference to the Midwest
bank robbers. Thus, upon our original review of these lab reports, they were set
aside as irrelevant because we were unaware that the FBI was investigating any
connection or that there was any connection between Timothy McVeigh and the
Midwest bank robbers.
There were in 302s provided to us a few references to
people who we have come to learn were the Midwest bank robbers. Specifically,
there were seven 302s and inserts which referred to Michael Brescia, none for
Peter Langan, one for Richard Guthrie, five for Kevin McCarthy, four for Scott
Stedeford, and nine for Mark Thomas. Many of these reports mention more than one
of these individuals. In all, the defense was given fourteen separate reports
that refer to the Midwest bank robbers. None of these reports contains
information that would have linked any of them to the Murrah Building bombing.
As such, it was not until the disclosures by Mr. Solomon and our subsequent
investigation that we began to recognize the strong connections between the
Midwest bank robbers, Timothy McVeigh, and Elohim City. We then obtained the
ninety-one page 302, not from the State, but from Peter Langan's BOMBROB files
describing the FBI March 1996 debriefing of Richard Guthrie after his agreement
to testify on behalf of the federal government. Surprisingly, despite the fact
that the FBI clearly had been investigating the connections between the Midwest
bank robbers and the Murrah Building bombing, this 302 contains no mention of
Timothy McVeigh or anything about the Murrah Building bombing other than a brief
notation that the bank robbers left a newspaper article about Timothy McVeigh
and the Oklahoma City bombing in one of their getaway cars.
There was some information in the discovery material
the State provided to us, however, that shows that Mr. McVeigh was involved in
bank robberies. For example, Jennifer McVeigh told the FBI that prior to the
bombing her brother, Timothy, told her that he was involved in planning or
setting up a bank robbery. See attached Exhibit 10. Describing a conversation
that she had with her brother at the residence of their recently deceased
grandfather, Ms. McVeigh said:
At that time [Timothy McVeigh] advised me as follows:
He had been involved in a bank robbery but did not provide any further details
concerning this robbery. He advised me that he had not actually participated in
the robbery itself, but was somehow involved in the planning or setting up of
this robbery. Although he did not identify the participants by name, he stated
"they" had committed the robbery. . . . . It was my belief that this
bank robbery had occurred within the recent past. I was not made aware of any of
the details or if there were additional robberies involving my brother or any of
his associates. I do recall that my brother remarked that the money that he had
in his possession was his share of the proceeds.
McVeigh's grandfather died on October 16, 1994.
McVeigh returned home to Lockport, New York sometime in November 1994. Banks
were robbed by the Midwest bank robbers in Overland Park, Kansas on September
21, 1994, and in Columbus, Ohio on October 25, 1994.
Moreover, in one letter that McVeigh wrote to his
sister he talks approvingly of robbing banks. He states in that letter:
To start with, the credit "scam" (or our
friend who knocks over banks . . .) In the past, you would see the news and see
a bank robber, and judge him a 'criminal." But without getting too lengthy
the Federal Reserve and the banks are the real criminals, 'cash" as we know
it is counterfeit, and a dollar is just worthless paper, so where is the crime
in getting even / fighting a criminal? I guess if I reflect, it's sort of a
Robin Hood thing, and our gov't is the evil King.
See attached Exhibit 11. This letter was dated
December 24, 1993, approximately two months after the first robberies attributed
to the Midwest bank robbers took place in Columbus, Ohio. When these statements
are read together, they constitute admissions by Timothy McVeigh that he was
involved in a bank robbery. It is much more likely that the proceeds of this
bank robbery in which Mr. McVeigh participated provided the funding necessary to
bomb the Murrah Building rather than the so-called robbery of Roger Moore. It
also is very likely - given the circumstantial evidence described below - that
the bank robbery to which Mr. McVeigh is referring is one he planned with the
Midwest bank robbers.
One of the important links in the State's
circumstantial case against Terry Nichols has been the prosecutors' claim that
Terry Nichols robbed Roger Moore on November 5, 1994. The State lacks any direct
evidence but is relying solely on circumstantial evidence and alleged statements
by Timothy McVeigh to Michael and Lori Fortier to pin this robbery on Mr.
Nichols. Additionally, the State claims that Mr. Nichols shared the proceeds of
this robbery with Mr. McVeigh to finance the bombing of the Murrah Building.
Nevertheless, significant evidence will be introduced that shows that Roger
Moore was not robbed in the first place. For example, Roger Moore did not call
the sheriff after the alleged robbery until prompted to do so by his neighbors
and his description of the robber changed over time. The sheriff and
representatives of Moore's insurance company who investigated the alleged
robbery all believed that he had made up the story. In addition, when Moore
returned to his home with his neighbors after the alleged robbery, he went
directly to the place where the telephone lines had been severed, although he
had told them that he immediately went to their home after getting out of the
restraints he alleged were used on him.
If, in fact, Roger Moore was robbed on November 5,
1994, evidence that will be introduced at trial supports the conclusion that
Terry Nichols was not the robber. For example, Moore alleges that the robber had
a one-inch beard, a dark complexion and strong body odor. Days before the
alleged robbery, Lana Padilla saw Mr. Nichols without any facial hair. In
addition, Mr. Nichols is light-complected and was known for having good hygiene.
Finally, tire tracks taken near where Moore's van was abandoned following the
robbery did not match the tires on Mr. Nichols' truck.
Indeed, if Mr. Moore was robbed on November 5, 1994,
circumstantial evidence suggests that the actual robber(s) may have been members
of the Midwest bank robbers. Peter Langan is expected to testify that he and
Richard Guthrie, Jr. visited Roger Moore's home at least twice before the
alleged robbery. In addition, videotape seized from Mr. Guthrie's property,
entitled "Contract," allegedly contained images of Roger Moore's home.
Unfortunately, we have reason to believe that this videotape was destroyed by
the federal government. Finally, an Arkansas driver's license in the name of
"Bob Miller" was found in a storage facility rented by the bank
robbers. "Bob Miller" is an alias used by Roger Moore. Other testimony
at trial will show that, prior to the alleged Moore robbery, Richard Guthrie,
Jr. possessed everything that Moore described the robber as wearing and using
during the robbery; namely, a ski mask, "Israeli combat boots,"
plastic restraints, and the exact type of weapon allegedly used by the robber.
Conversely, in the case of Mr. Nichols, there is no evidence that he ever
committed a violent act in his life, let alone committed an armed robbery.
Moreover, the State cannot connect Mr. Nichols to the specific clothing and
weapon described by Moore. Despite the fact that the federal government was
aware that evidence seized from the Midwest bank robbers tied them to Roger
Moore "robbery," none of this information was provided to the defense.
E. Frustrating the Defense Investigation
In the summer of 2001, defense investigation was shut
down because of the funding controversy. It was not until January of 2003 that
the defense began to resume investigating this case. Most of the defense
efforts, however, at that point were consumed getting ready for the preliminary
hearing scheduled for May 2003. It was only after the preliminary hearing, in
the summer of 2003, that the defense began in earnest to resume its
investigation.
At this point, the defense faced a truly daunting
challenge. With the trial set for less than a year away, the defense had to
locate and interview hundreds of witnesses when we had only reviewed a small
fraction of the material contained in the 37 files cabinets located in the
District Attorney's Office. It is true that theoretically we have had access to
the materials in those cabinets since January of 2000. As a practical matter,
however, given the sheer volume of discovery provided to the defense, we had
only been able to review a small percentage of the material in those cabinets.
Before the team was disbanded in July 2001, the defense had concentrated on
organizing the voluminous discovery material and reviewing as many of the 302s
as possible. Our problems were compounded by the state prosecutors' initial
resistance to our efforts to copy all of the material in those cabinets or to
provide us the indexes that they had. In addition, the state prosecutors were
unwilling to allow us to scan those materials so that they could be computer
searchable.30 It was not until May 30, 2003, that this Court ordered that the
indexes be provided to us and that the defense be permitted to scan those
documents. It took several months for the defense to scan a considerable number
of those documents, but the time and expense involved was too great to scan all
of the materials in the possession of the State. In fact, many of the documents
in those file cabinets remain unread.
It was at that time that the defense sent a letter to
Ms. Elliott setting forth its defense theories and requesting any exculpatory
material given those theories. Specifically, the defense asked for any
information that pointed to the fact that Timothy McVeigh conspired with others
whose identities were still unknown to bomb the Murrah Building. A copy of that
letter is attached as Exhibit 12. We sent this letter to Ms. Elliott outlining
our defense theories, therefore, because we knew we would be unable to
physically search all of the 37 file cabinets. She continued to insist, however,
that the full extent of her Brady obligation was turning over the 302s in her
possession and making the 37 file cabinets available for our inspection. Because
we feared that there was, in fact, exculpatory material that we were missing in
the District Attorney's Office, we continued to push Ms. Elliott to disclose
material as requested in our letter.
Our last Motion for Continuance spells out our efforts
to compel the federal government and the state prosecutors to live up to their
obligation to disclose all exculpatory material about the Midwest bank robbers,
Elohim City, and McVeigh's involvement with members of this gang and with Elohim
City. Not only have the federal government and state prosecutors failed to turn
over exculpatory evidence, but they have consistently represented that none
exists. Moreover, they have done so while blocking our efforts to learn more
about Mr. McVeigh's connection with other suspects, especially those in Elohim
City. The state prosecutors vigorously resisted our efforts to obtain the state
grand jury transcripts31 and fought our efforts to obtain unredacted 302s.32
They resisted when we asked Judge Linder to order them to contact other law
enforcement agencies to obtain records relevant to the OKBOMB investigation.33
Moreover, the federal government and the state
prosecutors have thwarted our efforts to find out more about Elohim City and the
Midwest bank robbers and their connection with McVeigh by improperly invoking
the Touhy doctrine at the conditional examinations in this case. One example is
the pretrial conditional examination of Special Agent William Davitch of the
FBI. When defense counsel attempted to question Agent Davitch concerning his
knowledge of Kevin McCarthy, one of the Midwest bank robbers, the attorney for
the Department of Justice and the state prosecutor objected. See Conditional
Examination of William Davitch, December 2, 2003, at 33-35. This is particularly
illustrative of the state and federal governments' efforts to block our inquiry
into the connection between the OKBOMB investigation and that of BOMBROB because
it turns out that Agent Davitch was the one of the case agents on the BOMBROB
investigation.34
Another example of this is the conditional examination
of FBI Agent Lou Ann Sandstrom. Mr. Hermanson asked S.A. Sandstrom:
Did your investigation uh, include looking at any
connection between any of the following organizations and Mr. Timothy McVeigh or
Michael Fortier and the Oklahoma City bombing? Uh, the White Arian [sic]
Resistance, Elohim City, Arian [sic] Republican Army, Carol Howell [sic], Dennis
Mahan [sic], Andreas Strassmeir, Reverend Robert Mallar [sic], Bruce Mallar
[sic], Chevy Cheviekehoe [sic], C-h-e-v-i-e-k-e-h-o-e, Cheyne Cheviekehoe [sic].
Cheyne is C-h-e-y-n-e. Peter Langan, L-a-n-g-a-n. Peter Ward, Tony Ward, Michael
Brescia, B-r-e-s-c-i-a, Kevin McCarty [sic], Richard Guthrie (sic), Scott
Stedford [sic], S-t-e-d-f-o-r-d, Mark Thomas, Ray Willie Lampley, L-a-m-p-l-e-y,
and Kurt - Kurt Lyons, L-y-o-n-s?
Conditional Examination of Lou Ann Sandstrom, December
22, 2003, at 57. Mr. Thomas Ferraro, AUSA, on behalf of the DOJ instructed the
witness "not to answer any question posed to her uh, covered under
paragraphs one and two of the Defendant's request, which had been specifically
excluded under our Touhy letter on page three." Id. at 57-59.
The FBI, the Department of Justice, and the state
prosecutors might have been successful had it not been for AP reporter John
Solomon. Mr. Solomon's first article on February 25, 2004, spurred the defense
to file our last Motion for Continuance. On March 11, 2004, Mr. Solomon
published a second article detailing more information about the FBI
investigation into the connection between Timothy McVeigh and the Midwest bank
robbers. Attached as Exhibit 13. Based on the information learned from Mr.
Solomon, Mark Earnest went to the offices of J.D. Cash, a reporter with the
McCurtain Gazette located in Idabel, Oklahoma. The defense had learned that Mr.
Cash had obtained defense files relating to Peter Langan's federal prosecution
from Langan's attorneys. In the more than twenty-five boxes of documents, the
defense found additional evidence that the FBI did, in fact, as early as a week
after the bombing, investigate the connection between Timothy McVeigh and the
members of the Midwest bank robbery gang.
F. Solomon's Documents
At the hearing on March 1, 2004, the defense provided
the Court with copies of the four documents referred to in AP reporter John
Solomon's February 25, 2004 article. Those documents are attached here as
Exhibit 14. Following the hearing on March 1, the defense obtained additional
documents from Mr. Solomon. A review of those documents provided to us by Mr.
Solomon clearly shows that the FBI was actively investigating -- beginning
shortly after the bombing -- a connection between OKBOMB and BOMBROB as well as
a connection between Timothy McVeigh and Elohim City. This is significant for
three reasons. First, given the other evidence suggested in this motion,
evidence that points to a connection between McVeigh and to the Midwest bank
robbers or to persons in Elohim City directly supports Mr. Nichol's theory of
defense in this case.
Second, the federal government has acknowledged that
it is looking into why certain information about BOMBROB was supposedly not
communicated to the OKBOMB Task Force. Additionally, the federal government has
blocked our efforts to question witnesses about the Midwest bank robbers and
Elohim City and continues to block access to other documents generated in the
OKBOMB investigation. Finally, the federal government has withheld from the
defense virtually all of the documents pertaining to the BOMBROB investigation.
The federal government's evasive behavior strongly suggests that there is other
exculpatory material in its possession. Indeed, the documents we got from Mr.
Solomon are certainly not complete. One is missing a page and others refer to
other documents we have never been provided.
Third, exculpatory evidence includes impeachment
evidence or evidence that mitigates a defendant's involvement as well as that
which points to his innocence. These documents clearly contain exculpatory
evidence. Yet, none of the following documents discussed by the defense have
ever been turned over to us by the federal government or state prosecutors in
this case. Nor were they ever turned over to Mr. Nichols in the federal case.
Equally significant, however, is that these documents
and the information set forth in the following sections of this Motion show that
the federal government and the state prosecutors have not truthfully responded
to this Court's December 30th directive. Rather, it is clear that the federal
government knew considerably more about Mr. McVeigh and his connections to
Elohim City and the Midwest bank robbers than acknowledged when Mr. Deitch wrote
his letter of January 12, 2004. Indeed, it would not have required the federal
government to have conducted the massive undertaking suggested in his letter
because the federal government had already collected considerable information
that it was simply refusing to provide the defense or this Court.
Moreover, it is totally disingenuous for Ms. Elliott
to provide a list of 302s and inserts in response to this Court's December 30th
directive and to fail to acknowledge the host of other documents that are
directly responsive to this Court's inquiry.35 Certainly, the state prosecutors
have been well aware of the investigation into a connection between OKBOMB and
BOMBROB. Indeed, while conducting the Oklahoma County Grand Jury, investigating
the Murrah Building bombing, Ms. Lister (then Ms. Gump), while questioning Carol
Howe put a picture of Peter Langan in front of her and asked her if she had seen
him in Elohim City. Howe said she had. She also said she had seen some of the
other bank robbers there.36 Clearly, Ms. Lister would not have been asking about
these individuals and their connection to Elohim City absent a familiarity with
the Midwest bank robbers' case. Yet, as we demonstrate in the rest of this
Motion, absent Mr. Solomon's revelations we would have had no way of connecting
this line of questioning with the Midwest bank robbers or their link to this
case.
A review of the documents provided to us by Mr.
Solomon reveals the following:
Exhibit 15
Exhibit 15 is a four-page FBI memorandum that contains
the following information:
Date: January 1996
From: Director, FBI (174A-OC-56120) [Oklahoma City
bombing case number]
To: CP (Command Post) Oklahoma / Routine/
(and others)
On page three of this memorandum, it states that:
"While there is no evidence to directly link
[redacted] to the BOMBROB incident, it would appear possible that [redacted]
could have knowledge and/or conspiratorial input into such criminal activity.
Information has been received through the Southern
Poverty Law Center (SPLC) that one [redacted] AKA [redacted] telephone call from
[redacted] on or about 4/17/95, two days prior to the OKBOMB attack, when
[redacted] of the SPLC, was in the white supremacist compound at [redacted], OK.
[Redacted] allegedly has had a lengthy relationship with [redacted] one of two
indicted OKBOMB defendants. [Redacted] advised that [redacted] is currently
residing with [redacted] in [redacted] NC, and plans to leave the U.S. via
Mexico, in the near future. [Redacted] further advised that he/she has learned
that [redacted] for an unknown reason.
Prior OKBOMB investigation determined that [redacted]
had placed a telephone call to [redacted] on 4/5/95. A day that he was believed
to have been attempting to recruit a second conspirator to assist in the OKBOMB
attack. The OKBOMB Command Post is attempting to verify the version of events as
set forth by [redacted] and to develop further information."
This FBI memorandum is a veritable bombshell. It was
from the Director of the FBI and it specifically contains the Oklahoma City
bombing FBI case number. The copy obtained by the defense also has on the first
page a stamp and the handwritten number of one of the numbers assigned by the
FBI to a Midwest bank robbery. The handwritten FBI case number is
91A-CM-41359-409. There is no question that this memo should have been provided
to the defense.
The significance of this memo cannot be understated.
It refers to somebody in Elohim City allegedly having a lengthy relationship
apparently with McVeigh. Of critical importance is the fact that it refers to
the April 5, 1995 telephone call from McVeigh to Elohim City on "a day that
he [McVeigh] was believed to have been attempting to recruit a second
conspirator to assist in the OKBOMB attack." Despite the obvious connection
between McVeigh and Elohim City and despite the fact that the Oklahoma City
bombing investigators clearly had this memorandum, it was never provided to the
defense by either the federal government or the state prosecutors. More
importantly, the memo clearly indicates that the FBI believed that McVeigh was
in Elohim City to recruit a second conspirator "to assist in the OKBOMB
attack." Obviously, this is not a reference to Terry Nichols nor to Michael
Fortier. It is, however, explicitly exculpatory. If, in fact, this information
is true, it directly refutes the State's theory that Terry Nichols was already
intimately involved with Tim McVeigh in carrying out the Murrah Building attack.
Although the memo does not indicate the basis for the FBI Director's belief, it
unquestionably indicates that the FBI had additional, important information
about an unknown "second conspirator" not set forth in this memo. The
defense has not been provided either with this memo or the information
supporting the FBI's conclusion.
Exhibit 16
Exhibit 16 is a five-page internal FBI memorandum that
contains the following information:
Date: August, 1996
From: Director FBI
Subject: "Changed"; Kevin McCarthy, Scott
Anthony Stedeford; Michael William Brescia, AKA fugitive; Peter Kevin Langan,
Richard Lee Guthrie (deceased); Mark Thomas. . . . Investigation has determined
that [redacted] has resided in Elohim City, Oklahoma for many years and his
wife's father in law was said to have been a former head of security at Elohim
City.
Information has been developed that [redacted] were at
the home of [redacted] Elohim City, Oklahoma on 4/5/95 when OKBOMB subject,
Timothy McVeigh, placed a telephone call to [redacted] residence. On 4/16/95, a
telephone call was placed from [redacted] residence to [redacted] residence in
Philadelphia division . . . .
Armed and Dangerous: ARA members advocate the violent
overthrow of the U.S. government; are known to be armed; use explosives; and in
the past have fired weapons at agents in an effort to avoid capture.
This is another critical memorandum from the Director
of the FBI that clearly sets forth information surrounding McVeigh's telephone
call to Elohim City on April 5, 1995. Importantly, this memo shows that the FBI
was investigating the connection between the Midwest bank robbers and Timothy
McVeigh. It clearly links McVeigh with Elohim City and it also indicates that
additional information about the joint investigation of OKBOMB and BOMBROB is
being developed that is not contained in this memorandum. Equally important,
this memo refers to another call made from Elohim City on April 16, 1995, to
Philadelphia - the hometown of one of the Midwest bank robbers. Although the
memo contains redactions that make it difficult to read, the clear inference is
that the FBI was connecting one of the Midwest bank robbers who was there at the
time of the critical call on April 5th with the call that was made on April
16th. Despite the obvious significance of this information, this memorandum has
still never been provided to the defense by the federal government or the state
prosecutors. Moreover, even though we now have this memo, it is still in a
redacted form that renders it of little use to the defense.
Exhibit 17
Exhibit 17 is four pages of a five-page internal FBI
BOMBROB memorandum. Apparently, Mr. Solomon did not receive the first page of
this memorandum and, therefore, we do not know when it was written. Nonetheless,
this memorandum indicates that Peter Langan and Richard Guthrie are suspects in
"the captioned matter" referring to the BOMBROB investigation. The
memorandum goes on to discuss Guthrie's known military training in the use of
explosives and directs certain FBI field offices to conduct further
investigation into Guthrie's military training in explosives. On page five, the
last line contains the notation "to FBI CP (Command Post) Oklahoma."
The "CP" obviously refers to the Oklahoma City bombing command post.
Since neither Langan nor Guthrie were ever accused of robbing a bank in
Oklahoma, it is obvious that the FBI was looking into the possibility that the
Midwest bank robbers assisted McVeigh in blowing up the Murrah Building. It is
difficult to imagine how Mr. Coulson and Mr. Defenbaugh can claim that they were
not fully briefed on the ongoing investigation as to the connection between the
Midwest bank robbers and OKBOMB.37 This document, however, has still never been
provided to the defense by the federal government or the state prosecutors.
Indeed, the lab report memos discussed earlier are a
clear indication that the FBI was specifically investigating the connection
between Timothy McVeigh and the Midwest bank robbers. Within two weeks of the
bombing, the FBI was comparing the fingerprints of McVeigh and Terry Nichols to
those found in a Cleveland bank robbery that was committed by the Midwest bank
robbers. In view of the fact that this FBI memorandum was specifically directed
to the Special Agent in Charge (SAC) in Oklahoma City on May 5, 1995, and even
though they both specifically mention Timothy McVeigh's name and one of them
mentions Terry Nichols' name and both of them mention the OKBOMB case number,
there is no basis for the claim that the OKBOMB Task Force was unaware of the
investigation into a connection between OKBOMB and BOMBROB. Additionally, it is
interesting to note that Exhibit 8 states: "Reference: Telephone call April
26, 1995." This shows that within one week of the Oklahoma City bombing
investigators were already concerned about the Midwest Bank robbers being
involved.
Exhibit 18
Exhibit 18 is a four-page FBI memorandum that contains
the following information:
Date: November 1995
From: FBI Omaha (174A-OC-56120) [Oklahoma City bombing
case number]
To: Director FBI / Priority /
FBI [Command Post] Oklahoma City/ Priority /
Subject: OKBOMB; Major Case 117; EID, OO: Oklahoma
City.
BOMBROB; BR (A); OO; Omaha (91A-om-41859) [A Midwest
Bank Robber
FBI case number for a bank robbery in Omaha, Nebraska]
This memo refers to a telephone call between FBI
special agents from Omaha, St. Louis, the Explosives Unit at FBI Headquarters,
and OKBOMB Command Post. It states:
"For information of receiving offices, BOMBROB is
investigating 17 bank robberies which have occurred throughout the Midwest area
of the United States since January 1994. These robberies have occurred in seven
states covering seven different FBI field offices. The last robbery occurred on
August 30, 1995, in Madison, Wisconsin. . . .
On October 28, 1995, America's Most Wanted aired a
segment on BOMBROB on their weekly telecast. Two composite sketches and one bank
surveillance video photograph were presented, including the composite sketch
obtained during the August 16, 1995 bank robbery that occurred in Bridgeton,
Missouri.
The OKBOMB investigation detected a similarity between
the sketch compiled during the August 16, 1995 bank robbery investigation and
the composite prepared of an individual know as [redacted] or [redacted]
(pronounced [redacted]). [Redacted] was identified as a third individual who
accompanied [redacted] and [redacted] when they visited a Cassville, Missouri
realtor named [redacted] at his office.
In approximately five of the 17 bank robberies
involved in BOMBROB, some type of smoke grenade or grenade simulator was either
left behind as a booby trap in the getaway vehicle or was ignited in the victim
bank. The FBI laboratory is currently in possession of all of these devices. The
FBIHQ Explosives Unit will be preparing a list of all serial numbers, lot
numbers, or any identifying marks found on these devices and this list will be
forwarded to the OKBOMB Task Force. It is the understanding of Omaha that Army
CID will be able to conduct any follow-up investigation as to the origin of the
grenade devices.
Oklahoma City Division at Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.
Will provide the Omaha Division with any information regarding the smoke
grenades and dummy grenades that will assist Omaha in the investigation of the
BOMBROB matter."
It is patently obvious that the OKBOMB and BOMBROB
Task Forces were investigating links between the bombing of the Murrah Building
and the Midwest bank robbers. Even though this memo was specifically directed to
the Oklahoma City Command Post and even though it specifically contains the FBI
OKBOMB case number, it was never provided to the defense by the federal
government or the state prosecutors. The composite developed in connection with
the OKBOMB case was provided to us in discovery, but it was not identified or
connected in any way to the composite of one of the Midwest bank robbers in the
BOMBROB investigation. Moreover, the defense has never received this memorandum
or the BOMBROB composite from either the federal government or the state
prosecutors. Significantly, without this memorandum, the defense would never
have been able draw this connection.
Exhibit 19
Exhibit 19 is a three-page FBI memorandum from the
Omaha office to other offices including Oklahoma City.
Date: August 22, 1996
To: Oklahoma City
[and others]
Case ID#: [BOMBROB FBI case number typed in and
another one hand-written]
Title: BOMBROB
MAJOR CASE 244
Details: For information of Little Rock and Oklahoma
City, . . .
The memo contains information provided to the FBI by
Midwest Bank robber Kevin McCarthy ("according to cooperating defendant
Kevin McCarthy"). The memo explains that Kevin McCarthy told the FBI that
Midwest Bank robber Scott Stedeford and bank robber co-conspirator Mark Thomas
bought a getaway vehicle, a 1983 Chevrolet Suburban, white in color on April 17,
1995, in Fort Smith, Arkansas. Fort Smith is close to Elohim City. The memo goes
on to say that, upon investigation, an Iowa Certificate of Title was issued on
this vehicle on 4/21/95 (two days after the Oklahoma City bombing).
Less than a month after this FBI memo was written,
Midwest bank robber Kevin McCarthy was interviewed by the FBI in connection with
the Oklahoma City bombing investigation. (See 302# 16027, dated September 18,
1996, attached as Exhibit 20.) During that interview, McCarthy stated that on
April 17, 1995, he was in Elohim City. He refers to Stedeford's purchase of a
vehicle in Fort Smith, Arkansas. The 302 further indicates:
[McCarthy] and Stedeford left Elohim City and went to
Pittsburg, Kansas. >From Pittsburg, Kansas they went to Des Moines, Iowa, for
the purpose of registering the vehicle Stedeford had bought. McCarthy advised it
was easier to register vehicles in the state of Iowa. They first heard about the
bombing on the car radio enroute back to Pittsburg, Kansas from Iowa. McCarthy
advised he returned to his home in Philadelphia from Pittsburg, Kansas.
The FBI investigation, as revealed in Exhibit 19,
however, proves that McCarthy was not truthful when he was interviewed by the
FBI in connection with the Murrah Building bombing. In that interview, McCarthy
tells the FBI that he first heard about the bombing on the car radio when was
returning from registering the vehicle in Iowa implying that he registered the
vehicle before April 19, 1995. However, this memo, never provided to the
defense, proves that McCarthy lied because the vehicle was actually registered
in Iowa on April 21, 1995. Given the pervasiveness of the coverage of the
bombing, it is unimaginable that a person would not have heard about it until
April 21. Thus, this memo shows that McCarthy lied to the FBI in the interview
documented in the 302 and disproves McCarthy's claimed alibi. Moreover, the fact
that McCarthy lied to the FBI suggests that he was interested in covering up his
whereabouts on April 19th and on the days leading up to the bombing. Despite the
fact that McCarthy lied to the FBI and the FBI possessed information that
refuted McCarthy's alibi, McCarthy was given a plea deal and a minimum sentence
in exchange for his testimony at the trials of two of his co-defendants, Richard
Guthrie and Scott Stedeford. The memorandum described above, which constitutes
important impeachment evidence, has never been provided to the defense by the
federal government or the state prosecutors.
Exhibit 21
Exhibit 21 is a two-page FBI memorandum from the
BOMBROB case dated 8/23/96 and page 19 from a list describing 302s provided to
defense counsel for Peter Langan, a defendant in the BOMBROB prosecutions.
Although the memo is partially redacted, it clearly
describes a trip that a Special Agent in the BOMBROB investigation made to
Muskogee, Oklahoma to interview a witness in that case. Upon further
investigation, the "hard copy" of the 302 that resulted from the
interview described in this memo reveals that the interview was that of Robert
G. Millar, leader of Elohim City. A closer look at that 302, received from the
State by defense counsel in this case, shows that the File # is redacted on all
three pages. The obvious question is why would the FBI redact the File # on this
302? The logical answer is that the file number on that 302 is not the OKBOMB
file number (174A-OC-56120) but rather that of a BOMBROB case. In fact, page 19
of a list of 302s provided to Langan's attorney by the federal government
clearly shows that this 302 was part of that case. By redacting the case number
in that 302, it appears that the FBI was attempting to prevent the defense from
learning that the FBI was investigating a connection between the suspects in the
OKBOMB case and those in the BOMBROB investigation.
The memo for Case ID #: 91A-OM-41859 [a BOMBROB case
number for a bank robbery in Omaha, Nebraska] describes as an enclosure an
attached 302 that was provided to OKBOMB "for information purposes
only." The defense did receive this particular 302 in discovery. However,
the defense did not receive the memo that provides an explanation as to the
origin and relevance of the 302. Indeed, given the FBI's deliberate attempt to
withhold critical information regarding the connection between the BOMBROB
investigation and the investigation into the activities of Timothy McVeigh, the
defense had no way of appreciating the significance of this 302 until after Mr.
Solomon's disclosures.
Exhibit 22
Exhibit 22 is a lead sheet numbered "6996"
that was filled out by Special Agent Angela Finley of the ATF. Although there is
no date in the upper portion of the first page, it appears that she probably
filled this lead sheet out on April 30, 1995.38
Among the comments made by Special Agent Finley in
this lead sheet are:
"Brief Summary from investigative case file
43270-94-0124B"
"Mahon has detonated explosives at E/C."
"E/C is preparing for war against U.S.
government"
"They support violence against the
government."
"Robert Millar of E/C has made numerous trips to
OKC."
"Robert Millar stated that he would be wiling to
hide anyone who needed a place to stay at E/C. (Elohim City)"
'This group was planning a march in Waco during the
Branch Davidian ordeal because they strongly support the Davidian's and strongly
oppose the ATF."
The information contained in this "lead
sheet" is not from some anonymous civilian with a hunch. Rather, Special
Agent Finley was a federal law enforcement officer with an informant who was
working undercover in Elohim City. It is important to note that S.A. Finley
prepared the attached two-page official ATF report on May 22, 1995. See Exhibit
23. On page 1 of that report, SA Finley refers to picking up CI-183 (Carol Howe)
and transporting her to Oklahoma City on April 21, 1995. Ms. Finley also
indicates that on that day "[a] lead sheet was then completed."
Assuming, based on the dates of lead sheets close in number to the above
mentioned lead sheet #6996, it is apparent that this lead sheet could not be the
one that Ms. Finley states she filled out on April 21, 1995. This is so because
lead sheet # 6996 appears to have been filled out on April 30, 1995.
Lead Sheet # 6996 is a powerful example of the kind of
information that is being withheld by the government in this case. It also
demonstrates, yet again, the calculated efforts of the federal government to
hide from the defense critical information that it has concerning the
involvement of persons at Elohim City in the Oklahoma City bombing. The defense
has not been provided the lead sheet # 6996 or the lead sheet completed by Ms.
Finley on April 21, 1995 by either the federal government or the state
prosecutors.
The importance of these two lead sheets is obvious. It
also is obvious why the federal government did not want to provide the defense
with access to all of the remaining undisclosed lead sheets. These lead sheets
would demonstrate that the FBI was actively monitoring those inside Elohim City
prior to the bombing. In addition, these lead sheets show that those in Elohim
City were preparing for a war against the United States government. This
confirms other information that we have received that Reverend Millar was
calling for a "Holy War", in part, to avenge the ATF's attack on the
Branch Davidian compound in Waco. Coupled with the other undisclosed information
regarding Timothy McVeigh's connection with Elohim City, it supports the defense
argument that Timothy McVeigh may well have been one of Elohim City's
"soldiers" and that the bombing of the Murrah Building was
orchestrated or at least assisted by those in Elohim City.
Moreover, the fact that those in Elohim City were
upset about Waco and willing to use violence against the government clearly
indicates that those in Elohim City would have been supportive of McVeigh's plan
to blow up the Murrah Building. Although Terry Nichols, like many Americans, was
upset by what happened at Waco, there is little evidence to suggest that he was
willing to use violence against the government in response to Waco. On the other
hand, this memo explicitly supports the argument that those in Elohim City were
not only willing to but were actually preparing to wage war against the United
States government because of Waco.
Equally important, it is clear from this lead sheet
that this is only a "brief summary" from a larger investigative case
file (43270-94-0124B) that unquestionably relates to the ATF's investigation
into the activities in Elohim City. Given the seriousness of the information
noted in this lead sheet and Ms. Howe's claims that she provided advance warning
to the ATF about the threat to the Murrah Building, this lead sheet provides a
compelling explanation for why the FBI and the ATF are withholding this
information from the defense. Unquestionably, the fact that there was an ongoing
investigation, as reflected in this lead sheet, indicates that the FBI and/or
the ATF were aware of what was going on inside Elohim City. It is
understandable, then, why the FBI has fought so hard to keep us from gaining
access to the lead sheets and failed to provide us this investigative file. That
is, either or both the ATF and FBI dropped the ball and failed to prevent the
bombing of the Murrah Building or, at the very least, they wanted to deflect
criticism for not having done enough to prevent the bombing.
Exhibit 24
Exhibit 24 is a two-page FBI memo generated in the
BOMBROB investigation. The memo is directed to "Director" (of the FBI)
using the Oklahoma City bombing FBI case number and also to "Oklahoma
City" using the Oklahoma City bombing FBI case number. It contains the
following information:
"To: Director, FBI Date: May 16, 1995
From: SAC, St. Louis (91-SL-179326) [a BOMBROB bank
robbery case]
Subject: UNSUBS
Maryland Heights, Missouri [bank robbery]
TIMOTHY MC VEIGH
OKBOM;
MAJOR CASE 117
(174A-OC-56120)
Reference St. Louis airtel to Director, captioned
"UNSUBS(2); . . . and FBI LABORATORY (Lab No. E-3427), dated 5/4/95."
This memorandum requests that the FBI laboratory
compare "any shoes submitted as evidence in connection with OKBOM and cause
comparison with shoe impressions lifted from those recovered in the Maryland
Heights, Missouri bank robbery." The end of the memo, under the heading
"leads," specifically directs the Oklahoma City Division of the FBI to
"ensure that all possible shoes seized in connection with OKBOM" be
submitted to the FBI lab for comparison of shoe impressions recovered in this
bank robbery case.
In this FBI memorandum, written less than a month
after the Oklahoma City bombing, the FBI are requesting impressions from the
shoes of the suspects in the Oklahoma City bombing for purposes of comparing
them to shoe impressions found at one of the Midwest bank robberies.
Unquestionably, the FBI was investigating a connection between the Midwest bank
robbers and the Oklahoma City bombing. Moreover, this memorandum also refers to
a previous FBI "airtel" that specifically mentions Timothy McVeigh's
name and which was dated May 4, 1995. Not only has the defense never received a
copy of that May 4, 1995 "airtel" or this memorandum from the federal
government or the state prosecutors; but we have also never received the results
of such comparisons.
Exhibit 25
Exhibit 25 is a one-page memo found in the BOMBROB
file. The memo refers to prints recovered during a Midwest Bank robbery that
occurred on June 8, 1994 in Springdale, Ohio.
Date May 30, 1995
Reference: Communication May 11, 1995
Your No. 91A0-CI-63809 [a FBI Midwest Bank Robbery
case number for a bank robbery in Cincinnati, Ohio]
The latent palm print is not a palm print of TIMOTHY
MC VEIGH, TERRY NICHOLS or JAMES DOUGLAS NICHOLS.
Once again, this memo shows that early on in the
Oklahoma City bombing investigation, the FBI was looking at the connection
between the suspects in the Oklahoma City bombing and the Midwest bank robbery
cases. The FBI compared the prints of Mr. Nichols and Timothy McVeigh to a
suspect print found at one of the robberies performed by the Midwest bank
robbers. Neither the federal government not the state prosecutors have provided
this memo to the defense.
Exhibit 26
Exhibit 26 is a six-page internal FBI memorandum from
August 1995 about the BOMBROB investigation marked "priority" which
states on page 6: "Receiving offices are reminded of the 8/11/95 edition of
the "USA Today" left behind in the get-away vehicle, opened to an
article on Timothy McVeigh and the Oklahoma City bombing."
Within a few months of the Oklahoma City bombing, the
Midwest bank robbers left a picture of Timothy McVeigh and an article about the
bombing on the front seat of one of their getaway vehicles. The use of the term
"reminded" suggests that there was an earlier communication to the
"receiving offices" pointing out the fact that this article was found
in one of the Midwest bank robbers' getaway vehicles. Needless to say, neither
the earlier communication nor this memorandum was ever provided to the defense
by the federal government or the state prosecutors.
Exhibit 27
Exhibit 27 is a six-page internal FBI memorandum that
contains the following information:
"Date: December, 1995"
'From: FBI St. Louis (91A-)M-4_859) [FBI BOMBROB case
number for a bank robbery in Omaha, Nebraska]"
"To: Director FBI / Priority /"
'FBI Oklahoma City / Priority /"
Page Four
"Since the August 3rd meeting, three additional
robberies have been attributed to the BOMBROB group. These robberies are the
August 6, 1995 robbery of the Magna Bank, Bridgeton, Missouri (St. Louis); the
August 30, 1995 robbery of Bank One Madison, Wisconsin (Milwaukee, Madison RA);
and the November 22, 1995 robbery of the Roosevelt Bank, St. Louis County,
Missouri (St. Louis).
Beginning with the May 24, robbery in Louisville,
Kentucky, the BOMBROB subjects started using the names of former FBI officials
to purchase some of their getaway vehicles. In the August, 1995 robbery in
Bridgeton, Missouri and the November, 1995 robbery in St. Louis County, Missouri
FBI and ATF clothing have been worn during the robbery. Also in these last two
St. Louis robberies a copy of an article on OKBOMB to include a picture of
[redacted] and a copy of the Declaration of Independence, respectively, were
left in obvious locations in the getaway vehicle to ensure recovery by law
enforcement.
Since the August meeting, this investigation has been
featured on the October 28, 1995 segment of America's Most Wanted (AMW), which
resulted in a possible connection between BOMBROB and OKBOMB."
The first full paragraph on page two suggests that a
Special Agent (SA) from FBI Oklahoma City CP (Command Post) participated in a
meeting with several other Special Agents from around the country. This FBI memo
further indicates that the Midwest bank robbers left additional "McVeigh"
articles in the getaway vehicles used in other robberies beyond the one referred
in Exhibit 26 above. Finally, this memo specifically refers to a "possible
connection between BOMBROB and OKBOMB." The memo was disseminated to FBI
Oklahoma City "priority" although none of the BOMBROB bank robberies
took place there. Despite the fact that this memo was sent to the FBI in
Oklahoma City, the defense has never received a copy from the federal government
or the state prosecutors.
Exhibit 28
Exhibit 28 is a two-page memorandum generated during
the BOMBROB investigation.
"Date: June 7, 1995
To: SAC, Cleveland
"Reference: Communication dated May 15,
1995"
FBI File No. 91A-CV-52143 [a BOMBROB bank robbery case
involving a bank in Cleveland, Ohio]:
Specimens:
Q18 One video tape
ALSO SUBMITTED:
15 prints from video tape
"The (Q18) video tape was examined to locate
frames depicting the bank robbers. These images were then compared to known
photographs of TIMOTHY MCVEIGH and TERRY NICHOLS to determine if they were
identical.
Due to a lack of image detail and resolution in the
(Q18) videotape no meaningful conclusion could be reached regarding the
identification of the depicted robbers. The submitted evidence is being returned
herewith."
This FBI memorandum reveals attempts by the FBI to
link Timothy McVeigh to a bank robbery performed by the Midwest Bank robbers.
This memo was clearly written in response to a "communication dated May 15,
1995" which must have asked that McVeigh's and Mr. Nichols' pictures be
compared with the surveillance tape of the bank robber of the Middleburg
Heights, Ohio bank. Although this memo was included in a group of 550 lab
reports turned over to us; see Lab Report 74, its significance was not apparent
to the defense until after Mr. Solomon's revelations. Moreover, the defense
still should have received a copy of the May 15, 1995 communication that
presumably contained some information and the basis for requesting the
examination of the bank robbery videotape and its comparison to the likeness of
Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols. Finally, the bottom of the first page of the
memo states: "Enclosure 1 - SAC, Oklahoma City." SAC means Special
Agent in Charge. It is unclear what is meant by "Enclosure -1."
Neither the enclosures nor the earlier communication were provided to the
defense by the federal government or the state prosecutors.
Exhibit 29
Exhibit 29 is Insert #E-4206, a document that actually
was turned over in discovery to the defense by the State. Exhibit 29 reveals
that an investigation was conducted on May 4, 1995, at San Francisco, California
by Special Agent (SA) Thomas P. Ravenelle. It states:
"Reference Bureau teletypes to all field offices
dated 4/27/95, and 5/1/95.
Referenced Bureau teletypes directed all field offices
to review bank robbery files and compare methods of operations (mo's) to mo's
outlined in the teletype dated 4/27/95, which are believed to have been used by
subject MCVEIGH and his associates."
Although this document was produced by the State, its
significance was not apparent to the defense because of the absence of the other
documents described in this motion and the fact that the FBI sanitized the
materials provided to the defense to mask the fact that it was investigating a
connection between McVeigh and the Midwest bank robbers. The Insert does show
that as early as April 27, 1995, one week after the bombing, the FBI made a
connection between bank robberies and "MCVEIGH and his associates."
This April 27, 1995 FBI memo referenced in this Insert actually contains a bank
robbery "mo" that the FBI "believed" to have been used by
McVeigh and his associates. Neither this April 27, 1995 memo, nor the May 1,
1995 memo referred to in Insert E-4206 has ever been provided to Mr. Nichols.
Clearly, these memos set forth additional information regarding the connection
between Timothy McVeigh and the Midwest bank robbers.
G. Critical Information Contained in 1B 3484
Based on the information received from Mr. Solomon and
Mr. Cash, the defense decided to go back and review the materials provided to us
by the State to determine whether or not there was additional material that
supported a connection between Timothy McVeigh and the Midwest bank robbers or
those persons connected to Elohim City. The defense discovered for the first
time in this new review, a group of documents contained in a 1B file - 1B3484.
That 1B file consists of 1,354 pages of documents and reports generated by the
United States Secret Service related to the investigation of Timothy McVeigh and
Terry Nichols. A review of this 1B file, in light of the new information the
defense had received from Mr. Solomon and Mr. Cash, provides powerful support
for the argument that Tim McVeigh was assisted by persons in Elohim City and by
the Midwest bank robbers in carrying out his plot to blow up the Murrah
Building. Although this 1B file was in the file cabinets maintained in the
District Attorney's Office, the defense did not actually review 1B3484 until
March of 2004.
In fact, it was not until Mr. Earnest found Langan's
calling card numbers and we began a computer search for telephone records that
we inadvertently stumbled across 1B3484. Upon reviewing 1B3484 looking for phone
records, the defense for the first time learned that it contained significant
exculpatory material. Although specifically directed by this Court on December
30, 2003, to let this Court and the defendant know if they "have any hint,
any indication, direct or indirect, that any of these groups played a role in
the bombing of the Murrah Building," 1B3484 was never identified by the
state prosecutors as a document containing exculpatory material. Indeed, the
first page of the critical Secret Service timeline discussed below contains the
handwritten notation: "Remove." Obviously, someone in the federal
government or on the state prosecutors' team recognized the importance of the
exculpatory material described in 1B3484. Fortunately, this removal directive
was overlooked or ignored.
A reading of 1B3484 makes perfectly clear, however,
that the federal government and the state prosecutors still have not provided
Mr. Nichols all of the exculpatory material that has been gathered in connection
with the investigation of the Oklahoma City bombing. Moreover, as the
"removal" notation dramatically illustrates, the federal government
and the State have sought to keep the defense from discovering this vital
evidence. Specifically, 1B3484 contains the following:
Exhibit 30
Exhibit 30 is an official six-page report directed to
the "Intelligence Division" of the Secret Service and dated May 31,
1995. The report also indicates that the Tulsa RA has been in contact with all
local and federal law enforcement agencies and has been cooperating with the ATF
and the FBI in the investigation of the Murrah Building bombing. The report
describes the location, membership, leadership, and history of the militia group
in Elohim City. The report noted that the Elohim City militia was a
"reformation of the CSA group [Covenant, Sword, Arm of the Lord]" that
had surrendered to the ATF and FBI after a long standoff on April 19, 1985. The
report also noted that several former Branch Davidians were believed to be
occupants of Elohim City.
The report also describes the links between Elohim
City and groups in South Dakota, Michigan, and other militia groups in the
Northwest as well as "very strong connections with Posse Comitatus groups
in Pennsylvania." The report further noted that the group had received
training from two former members of the German army, one of whom was believed to
be Andreas Karl Strassmeir.
After discussing Robert Millar, who is described as a
strident racist and noting that his son-in-law James Ellison led the CSA
movement in Arkansas, the report notes that:
. . . It was Ellison who was the camp commander of the
CSA camp in northwest Arkansas that was the subject of the standoff with the FBI
and ATF; the camp surrendered to federal authorities on April 19, 1985.
Millar also was an acquaintance of Richard Snell, a
former member of the Arkansas CSA. Snell was executed by the State of Arkansas
after Snell had been convicted of murdering a black Arkansas state trooper.
Millar attended the execution of Snell, and Snell is buried at Elohim City.
Snell was executed by the State of Arkansas on April 19, 1995, the day of the
bombing in Oklahoma City.
Investigation regarding the Oklahoma City Bombing has
revealed that Tim McVeigh telephoned Elohim City at least two times. One call
was placed after McVeigh rented the Ryder truck used in the bombing, and another
call was placed sometime before the bombing. Records indicated McVeigh was
ticketed by an Arkansas State Trooper on October 12, 1993, on a road
approximately 20 miles from Elohim City.
The date April 19 apparently has much significance to
Millar, McVeigh and the right-wing organizations. April 19 has been linked by
these groups with many alleged historical events. The link between Millar,
McVeigh, the Oklahoma City bombing and the fact that Snell was executed on the
same day as the Oklahoma City bombing remains under investigation.
Finally, the report notes that the ATF has an active
investigation of the Oklahoma militia and the Elohim City group. It also notes
that the Secret Service would be meeting with the ATF and FBI supervisors to
work together on any continuing investigations regarding these groups.
The importance of this intelligence report is
undeniable. First, the Secret Service highlights in this report significant
background material about the group in Elohim City. The report shows the rabid
anti-government attitudes of those in Elohim City and directly links them to
Waco. Indeed, the connections between those in Elohim City and the April 19th
Murrah Building bombing are spelled out in chilling detail. Much of this report
corroborates the statements made by Carol Howe. She not only said that
Strassmeir and Mahon had talked about making bombs and the need to take action
against the federal government but that Strassmeir specifically told her he was
interested in blowing up a federal building. Indeed, she indicated that they had
targeted the Murrah Building. In addition, Howe described Reverend Millar as
urging the residents of Elohim City to engage in a "Holy War" against
the federal government. Howe also described that the residents at Elohim City
were very familiar with what had happened at Waco and admired David Koresh. She
also reported that there were many weapons stored at Elohim City and that
Strassmeir regularly led military training exercises. Strassmeir not only was
familiar with bomb making but copies of The Turner Diaries were readily
available in Elohim City. See E-427 (interview with Carol Howe).
Second, incredibly, neither the federal government nor
the state prosecutors have ever revealed to any one that Timothy McVeigh made
more than one phone call to Elohim City. The defense had been informed that Mr.
McVeigh made a phone call to Elohim City on April 5, 1995, using the Daryl
Bridges phone card. Yet, this Secret Service report reveals that Timothy McVeigh
called Elohim City at least two times with the second time being after he had
rented the Ryder truck. Such evidence directly points to Mr. McVeigh's
connection to Elohim City.
Unquestionably, this evidence is exculpatory in
nature. Indeed, in view of Exhibit 22 and all of the other evidence the defense
has learned since Mr. Solomon's revelations, it is clear that those in Elohim
City intended to wage war against the government. Moreover, April 19th was an
important symbolic date to those in Elohim City. Given Mr. McVeigh's
relationship with those in Elohim City, the fact that the bomb was detonated on
April 19th is hardly a coincidence. Rather, this report convincingly supports
the defense theory that it was persons connected to Elohim City who assisted Mr.
McVeigh in the bombing, including the Midwest bank robbers.
In addition, this report makes it clear that various
agencies were going to work together on a continuing investigation of Elohim
City and the Oklahoma militia. Despite the fact that the document specifically
indicates that there will be regular updates provided, we have not received the
reports that reflect that continuing investigation. Indeed, another document we
uncovered in our post-Solomon investigation confirms that the ATF was continuing
to investigate Elohim City and the link with Mr. McVeigh. Exhibit 31 is a
Department of Treasury BATF form for "Request for Advance of Funds"
signed and dated by Angela Finley-Graham and her superior David Roberts on May
18, 1995, contains the following handwritten information in the
"Explain/Justification" part of the form:
This investigation involves the Bombing of the Murrah
Bldg. in Oklahoma City, OK. It is suspected that members of Elohim City were
involved directly or indirectly through conspiracy. It is suspected that suspect
#2 may be at the location.
Once again the basis for such "suspicions"
are not set forth in any report we have received.
Moreover, we also know that Ms. Howe's observations
were, in fact, corroborated by another person inside Elohim City. It was only
after the disclosures by Mr. Solomon and our new look for evidence connecting
Timothy McVeigh to Elohim City that we again came across 302 # 14815. Attached
as Exhibit 32. We had presented this redacted 302 in a group of redacted 302s to
Judge Linder asking that we be provided an unredacted version. Judge Linder
reviewed an unredacted version of this document in camera and denied our
request, ruling that the 302 would not lead to relevant or admissible
evidence.39 It is clear, however, in light of all the other evidence we have now
learned about Elohim City, that this information is highly relevant to the
defense of this case. The witness in this redacted 302 directly connects Timothy
McVeigh with Elohim City. This redacted 302 indicates that the unknown person
connects Timothy McVeigh with Elohim City. The 302 states: "[The unknown
interviewee] stated that [redacted] was "99 percent sure" about having
seen McVeigh and "150 percent sure" about [Andreas] Strassmeir.
[Redacted] advised that [redacted] could determine the exact dates of the visits
when [redacted] observed Strassmeir and McVeigh [redacted] to determine when
[redacted] had visited the compound [redacted]." We do not know who this
person is, but it appears likely that he or she has additional information about
McVeigh and his activities inside Elohim City. Although the State turned over
this redacted 302 to us, they have not provided us the name of this witness,
which effectively prevents us from making any use of this information.
Finally, this second call and the existence of this
second witness provides additional corroboration of Ms. Howe's observations. Not
only did she warn the ATF of her concerns about the military buildup in Elohim
City, but she warned of a potential "Holy War." She also specifically
warned that Strassmeir and Mahon were targeting the Murrah Building. In fact,
she accompanied them to Oklahoma City to scout out the Murrah Building. It is
inconceivable that the federal government and the state prosecutors would
withhold this information from the defense and this Court.
Exhibit 33 and Exhibit 34
Exhibit 33 is page 73 of a 129-page timeline prepared
by the Secret Service and contained in the 1,354 pages of 1B3484. Exhibit 34 is
page 79 of that same timeline.
Exhibit 33 contains the following entry for Monday,
April 24, 1995 (emphasis added):
A witness to the explosion named Grossman claimed to
have seen a pale yellow Mercury car with a Ryder truck behind it pulling up to
the Federal Building. Mr. Grossman further claimed to have seen a woman on the
corner waving to the truck. ATSAIC McNally noted that this fact is significant
due to the fact that the security video shows the Ryder truck pulling up to the
Federal Building and then pausing (7-10 seconds) before resuming into a slot in
front of the building. It is speculated that the woman was signaling the truck
when a slot became available.
Exhibit 34 contains the following entry for Tuesday,
April 25, 1995 (emphasis added):
The initiation device is still unknown at this time.
However, based on their military training, the simplest and most reliable
initiation system would be TIME FUSE. Security video tapes from the area show
the truck detonation 3 minutes and six seconds after the suspects exited the
truck. A radio controlled (R/C) activation device is possible, if the suspects
constructed or purchased such a system. One possible lead could be directed at
"Ballisticorp" which stated that they sold three blowguns to the
suspect, which normally cost $20.00 each, however, the COD bill was $600.00. The
company may also sell R/C equipment. (GLOD).
These exhibits conclusively prove that the federal
government and state prosecutors have concealed critical videotapes from the
defense. Once again, the significance of these tapes is beyond dispute. Not only
do the videotapes show the actual detonation but they apparently reveal that
suspects got out of the Ryder truck immediately prior to the detonation.40 This
evidence explicitly corroborates the testimony of numerous witnesses who claimed
that they saw McVeigh with another in the Ryder truck.41 By hiding these
videotapes, the FBI allowed federal prosecutors to impeach truthful witnesses
and make them appear incredible. For example, Daina Bradley42 in Mr. Nichols'
federal trial was aggressively cross-examined by Patrick Ryan and made to appear
unbelievable when she claimed that she saw two men getting out of the Ryder
truck. Moreover, the sequence of events as reflected in these videotapes may
resolve questions about the timing of events leading up to the explosion.
Although the significance of such videotapes is
obvious, the defense has never received a copy of these videotapes. Even more
troubling, despite our repeated requests for any relevant videos related to the
bombing, this Secret Service report confirms the existence of critical videos
that we and this Court have been repeatedly assured do not exist. Contrary to
the federal government's and state prosecutors' representations, all relevant
videos have not been provided to us.
Exhibit 36
Exhibit 36 is page 126 of the Secret Service
timeline.43 It contains the following entry for Friday, May 19, 1995 at 5:45
p.m.:
The FBI asked the Fortiers who they believe were
involved in the bombing. They stated the Nichols brothers, Colbern, Kevin
Nicholas and Bob LNU, from Arkansas.
Steve Colbern was a friend of Timothy McVeigh and
shared McVeigh's hatred of the United States government. Evidence will be
introduced at trial to show that Mr. Colbern wrote several letters to Timothy
McVeigh expressing an interest in joining McVeigh in his anti-government
activities. In addition, we will introduce evidence that McVeigh left a letter
for Colbern attached to a utility pole in the desert, in which McVeigh stated
that he was looking for "fighters" not "talkers." Colbern is
a chemist with experience in bomb-making, who expressed a desire to take action
against the federal government.
Nearly three years after the federal trials of Timothy
McVeigh and Terry Nichols, the only two perpetrators of the bombing according to
the federal and state governments, federal investigators conducted interviews
with people associated with Steven Colbern. This Court also received the reports
of these interviews as exhibits to our last Motion for Continuance. These
interviews show that McVeigh was in direct contact with Colbern before the
bombing and that Colbern's friends lied to the FBI to cover up that connection.
Those interviews also show that Fortier knew Clark Vollmer and that he had
purchased drugs from him - contrary to Fortier's testimony at the preliminary
hearing in this case. See Preliminary Hearing Transcript at 111, May 13, 2003.
Mr. Fortier was also asked by defense counsel at the
preliminary hearing in this matter if he knew a person named Steven Colbern, and
he denied it.44 Although on other occasions Fortier has acknowledged that he
discussed Colbern with McVeigh, Fortier's preliminary hearing testimony suggests
that he did not know Colbern. Thus, any statement by Fortier to the contrary
should have been provided to us pursuant to Brady. Moreover, when the FBI
questioned the Fortiers about their belief as to others involved in the bombing,
undoubtedly the Fortiers were questioned as to the basis of their belief. There
should be some memo or report that provides the Fortiers' explanation as to why
they believed Colbern, Kevin Nicholas, and Bob LNU from Arkansas were involved
in the bombing. We have been provided some information regarding Michael
Fortier's allegations about Terry Nichols' involvement in the bombing and some
information about McVeigh's statements to Fortier about Colbern. Nonetheless,
the defense has not been provided any information regarding the basis of the
Fortiers' beliefs that others identified in this report were involved in the
bombing.
Exhibit 37
Exhibit 37 consists of two pages that are part of an
incomplete print out of a computer generated report. These two pages simply
appear in the middle of the 1,354 pages of the Secret Service file with no
explanation. They are obviously incomplete because of the handwritten notations
describing separate lists as "set[s]" and then numbering them.
What is particularly interesting about these documents
is the fact that among the list of seven names identified as "set #
5," is the name of Richard Lee Guthrie. Guthrie, of course, was one of the
Midwest bank robbers. It is possible that these lists contain names of some sort
of watch list generated by the Secret Service. This is so because Richard Lee
Guthrie was being actively investigated by the Secret Service prior to the
Oklahoma City bombing because of threats that he had made concerning former
President Bush.45 It is a mystery why this document is included in 1B3484. There
certainly is no explanation provided in 1B3484 or in any of the other materials
provided to us by the State. Rather, the federal government appeared to go to
considerable lengths to sanitize the materials provided to us to eliminate the
possibility that the defense would connect the investigation of the Midwest bank
robbers with the ongoing investigation in this case.
Exhibit 38
Exhibit 38 consists of pages 55 and 61 of the Secret
Service time line.46 Page 61 contains the following entry for Sunday, April 23,
1995:
A barber has been located in Junction City, KS, and
reports that he may have cut the hair of both subjects recently. That interview
is still underway.
This reference is important because the existence of
such a witness corroborates defense witnesses. Specifically, Kim Adams will
testify that she saw Timothy McVeigh in the presence of another man - not Terry
Nichols -- on the Friday before the bombing. Ms. Adams will testify that, when
she observed Mr. McVeigh's picture in the paper following the arrest, she
identified him except for the fact that when she had seen him his hair was
longer. This means he had a haircut sometime between Friday, April 14 and
Wednesday, April 19, the day of the bombing. Two other defense witnesses, Tonia
Rumbaugh and Kathy Henderson, will testify that on the morning of April 18,
1995, McVeigh and another man (i.e., John Doe # 2) came into a hair salon in
Junction City, Kansas seeking haircuts but were turned away because the salon
was booked with appointments. Therefore, the existence of a witness who is a
barber in Junction City who cut Mr. McVeigh's and his companion's hair would be
critical in terms of impeaching the State's theory of events. A computer-aided
search of all 302s provided to us by the State fails to locate any 302 involving
a "barber" or "haircut" in relation to Junction City.
Moreover, the defense does not have any report or documentation identifying who
this person is. Thus, this is yet another example of a report that was not
disclosed to the defense.
H. The FBI's Investigation of the Midwest Bank Robbers
Calling Cards/Phone Records
Despite the FBI's efforts to sanitize the discovery
provided to the defense to mask any involvement of the Midwest bank robbers with
the April 19th bombing plot, it is indisputable that the FBI was actively
looking into the activities of the Midwest bank robbers as early as a week after
the Murrah Building bombing.47 Indeed, after John Solomon's revelations, Mr.
Earnest reviewed some of Peter Langan's defense files at Mr. Cash's office and
discovered that the Midwest bank robbers were using telephone calling cards much
in the same way that Timothy McVeigh used the Daryl Bridges card. Based on this
discovery, Mr. Earnest went back and reviewed some of the 1As and 1Bs that had
been scanned into the defense computer system. As already indicated, however,
the defense still has not scanned in all of the 1A and 1B files located in the
District Attorney's file cabinets. Thus, Mr. Earnest had to physically search
the District Attorney's filing cabinets. When Mr. Earnest searched those file
cabinets, he discovered some telephone calling card records that matched some of
the calling card numbers used by the Midwest bank robbers. Nevertheless, nothing
in the 1A or 1B files identifies these telephone numbers as being connected to
the Midwest bank robbers. Indeed, until receiving the information from Mr.
Solomon and Mr. Cash, the defense would have had no way of connecting any of
these phone records to the Midwest bank robbers or really appreciating their
significance.
The results of Mr. Earnest's search of the materials
and documents contained in the BOMBROB files in Mr. Cash's office together with
his review of some of the 1A, 1B, and 1C files amassed by the FBI in the OKBOMB
case clearly demonstrate that FBI agents from both the BOMBROB and OKBOMB Task
Forces were actively pursuing an investigation into the connection between
crimes committed by the Midwest bank robbers and the bombing of the Murrah
Building. Of critical significance is the fact that the FBI actually obtained
telephone records of the Midwest bank robbers months before the first of the
bank robbers was arrested in January 1996. This fact strongly suggests that the
FBI had an informant or access to other information that permitted the FBI to
subpoena phone records of the Midwest bank robbers. Given the information
discussed in the last section, it is highly likely that the ATF's ongoing
investigation into the activities in Elohim City enabled the ATF and, in turn,
the FBI to know what records to subpoena.
Moreover, it appears that the FBI, the federal
government, and the State have withheld additional calling card records of the
Midwest bank robbers that may well support the conclusion that these men aided
Timothy McVeigh in his plot to bomb the Murrah Building. As Frederick Dexter has
already testified at this trial, the FBI commonly subpoenas telephone records in
an effort to develop leads and to check out particular suspects. That was done
in both the OKBOMB and BOMBROB investigations. A comparison of some of the
telephone records in the two cases reveals that the FBI was clearly
investigating the possible involvement of the Midwest bank robbers in the
Oklahoma City bombing. As the following columns graphically illustrate, calling
card account numbers that are referenced in Peter Langan's BOMBROB file were
also located in the OKBOMB file.
BOMBROB OKBOMB
1052239845 1052239845
1184277771
1247621602
1406554333
1409554333
1247621602
1649719062 1649719062
1674187942 1674187942
1742617125
1760920159 1760920159
2778248611 2778248611
3057231504
3259413782 3259413782
3954104162
5346061222
5532512530
5594696351
5595696351
6984838299 6984838299
7140638643
8611078005
9803283211
It was not until Mr. Earnest found the attached
prepaid telephone calling card account records in Peter Langan's BOMBROB file in
Mr. Cash's office that the defense had any idea that some of the numbers in the
OKBOMB file were connected to the Midwest bank robbers. See attached Exhibits
40, 41, 42 from Langan's BOMBROB file and Exhibits 43, 44, 45, and 46 from the
BOMBROB file. There is no question that these prepaid calling card account
numbers belonged to members of the Midwest bank robbery group. Not only were
these calling card numbers found in Langan's files, but a review of the numbers
called supports that conclusion. For example, Exhibits 41 and 42 from the
BOMBROB file and Exhibit 44 from the OKBOMB file show calls made to or from
Michael Brescia's father's telephone number.48 Exhibits 41, 42, and 44 also show
calls made either to or from Kevin McCarthy's grandmother's telephone number.49
Finally, Exhibits 42 and 44 shows three calls being made to convicted Midwest
bank robbery co-conspirator Mark Thomas' telephone number.50
Remarkably, many of the records for these specific
calling cards involve calls either going into or coming out of Elohim City --
(918) 427-7739. There are over forty such calls involving the Elohim City phone
number. See Exhibit 43. Certainly, the State or the federal government would not
suggest that these cards belonged to Timothy McVeigh -- even though they are
found in the Oklahoma City bombing investigation file -- because that would
suggest even more of a connection between McVeigh and Elohim City. It is
obvious, therefore, that the Midwest bank robbers were regularly making calls to
and from Elohim City.51
As Mr. Dexter indicated in his trial testimony, the
FBI, when investigating the OKBOMB case, was subpoenaing the telephone records
of people suspected of involvement in the Murrah Building bombing. In the OKBOMB
files, Mr. Earnest found subpoenas from the federal grand jury from the Western
District of Oklahoma seeking prepaid calling card account records for specific
cards used by the Midwest bank robbers. These records were being sought at least
as early as August 1995, and probably earlier, even though no bank robbery
allegedly committed by the Midwest bank robbers ever took place in Oklahoma.
Unquestionably then, the OKBOMB investigators were looking into the activities
of the Midwest bank robbers to see if they were involved in the Murrah Building
bombing.
A thorough review of all the Midwest bank robbery
phone records reveals two other important points. First, in reviewing the
Midwest bank robber telephone records found in Langan's BOMBROB files, Mr.
Earnest found entries for six (6) different telephone calls for account number
6984838299. In the corresponding OKBOMB records in the District Attorney's
Office, that particular account number is referred to only in 1A-1108. In
1A-1108, there are entries for only three (3) telephone calls made on that
account number. Thus, the Midwest bank robber's telephone records contained in
the Oklahoma City bombing file unquestionably are incomplete.
Furthermore, the last line of the paragraph of the
federal grand jury subpoena found in 1A - 0617 in the District Attorney's files
specifically lists six (6) ten-digit calling card accounts for which records
were being sought. Yet, a comparison of those account numbers with the account
records actually contained in the 1A file show an important inconsistency. The
last account number listed in the subpoena is 1247621602. Although the printouts
for the account numbers for the other five accounts listed in the subpoena are
in file 1A-0617, there are no records regarding account number 1247621602.52
Instead, in the file is a printout of another account record for account number
1406554333. Those two numbers, 1247621602 and 1406554333, are nowhere close
enough in similarity to suggest that the inclusion of one for the other is due
to a simple clerical error. Rather, what this suggests is that - for whatever
reason - the FBI is deliberately withholding the complete records for account
number 1247621602 - which they unquestionably subpoenaed. Additionally, this
shows that the FBI obtained separate account records -- in this case, at least
for account number 1406554333 -- for which the defense can find no subpoena.
This suggests that the FBI obtained even more Midwest bank robbery telephone
records than those contained in the District Attorney's files.
After discovering the calling card records in Langan's
files in Mr. Cash's office and finding the Midwest bank robbery calling card
numbers in the OKBOMB files, Mr. Earnest attempted to track down the calling
card company that had issued the calling cards. In view of the fact that a
number of the subpoenas were directed to a company called Fone America, Inc.,
Mr. Earnest tried to find out precisely what records Fone America, Inc. had
provided to the FBI during the course of the investigation of the Oklahoma City
bombing. The 1A-0616 and 1A -0617 files contain fax cover sheets from Fone
America, Inc., to Special Agent Elvis McBride of the FBI. Agent McBride was one
of the agents responsible for subpoenaing and gathering the voluminous telephone
records during the investigation of the bombing. On these fax cover sheets is
the name of Joe G. Joseph / Vice-President - Operations, the person at Fone
America, Inc. who sent the records to Agent McBride. As Mr. Joseph indicated in
his attached affidavit, Exhibit 49, Fone America, Inc. no longer exists because
it went bankrupt. Mr. Earnest then located and spoke with Mr. Michael Grassmueck,
the bankruptcy trustee for Fone America, Inc., who has supplied an affidavit,
attached as Exhibit 50. According to Mr. Grassmueck, all corporate records for
Fone America, Inc. have been destroyed. Therefore, there is absolutely no way
the defense can now independently verify exactly what Fone America, Inc. records
were sent to the FBI/Western District of Oklahoma Grand Jury during the
investigation of this case.
Before becoming aware that the records of the
telephone calling cards used by the Midwest bank robbers even existed, the
defense had absolutely no reason to search for them among the literally hundreds
of thousands of records contained in the State's files. Moreover, the defense
would not have found them by searching for records pertaining to the
"Midwest bank robbers," "ARA," "BOMBROB" or the
names of "Langan" and "Guthrie" or any of the other bank
robbers to whom the calling cards belonged. That is so because of the vague
description in the 1A, 1B and 1C indexes provided to the defense. Each index
simply mentioned "Fone America, Inc." and in one instance referred to
"call detail for account number" and then listed six separate 10 digit
account numbers. Among the hundreds of thousands of telephone records gathered
by the FBI in this case there is no reasonable way that anybody could have
expected defense counsel to seek out, for example, 1A-0617 or 1A-0616 to find
these records earlier. The importance of these records became apparent to Mr.
Earnest only after he found the prepaid calling card records in Peter Langan's (BOMBROB)
file in Mr. Cash's office.
Among the subpoenas that Mr. Earnest found when he
began looking at telephone records was Federal Grand Jury Subpoena Number
0951610. See Exhibit 51; see also Exhibit 44 (1A-0617). This subpoena requests
"call detail" for six (6) Fone America, Inc. account numbers. It
remains a mystery to the defense how the FBI obtained the accounts numbers for
the prepaid calling cards used by the Midwest bank robbers necessary to subpoena
the records for those specific accounts. Certainly, no physical prepaid calling
card (besides the Spotlight "Darryl Bridges" card) was listed as
having been recovered as a result of the investigation of the Oklahoma City
bombing. A computerized search of every one of the 302s provided to the defense
in this case fails to find a single 302 which mentions these "Fone America,
Inc., Driveline" prepaid calling cards, the account numbers, or their
source in terms of the Oklahoma City investigation. Yet Federal Grand Jury
Subpoena # 951610 was issued on August 16, 1995, five months before any of the
Midwest bank robbers were arrested. It cannot be overemphasized that the FBI
agents involved in the federal grand jury investigation of the Oklahoma City
bombing must have known the actual telephone account numbers used by the Midwest
bank robbers when they began subpoenaing records. The account numbers for
prepaid calling cards are not recorded in toll records of specific outgoing and
incoming calls made on a particular telephone. As such, the FBI must have had an
alternative source for these account numbers.
Not only did the subpoena ask for the account records
for these calling card numbers - numbers that indisputably belonged to the
Midwest bank robbers - but the subpoena also demanded records pertaining to
particular calls. The "call detail" requested information as to what
calls were made from particular phones on specific dates to the
"1-800" number for Fone America, Inc. That number 1-800-808-0805 is
the entry number that somebody using a Fone America, Inc. DriveLine system
prepaid calling card had to call to access the service. Calling that number
would activate the same process as calling 1-800-793-3377 to access a Spotlight
calling card.
We have no way of knowing how many people in the
United States used Fone America calling cards in 1995. What is striking is the
fact that in requesting information about the phone records of the Midwest bank
robbers, the FBI was, in the same paragraph of the same subpoena, also checking
to determine if a Fone America calling card was used on critical dates and at
critical locations. A review of the records that were subpoenaed reveals that
the investigators were looking at the following:
[1] (913) 762-0650 on 2/22/95 . . . to 800/808-0805
[2] (913) 762-9679 on 4/4/95 . . . . to 800/808-0805
[3] (913) 762-9647 on 4/4/95 . . . . to 800/808-0805
[4] (602) 757-9902 on 4/9/95 . . . . to 800/808-0805
[5] (913) 762-0101 on 4/13/95, 4/15/95 & 4/20/95 .
. . . to 800/808-0805 [6] (405) 725-3461 on 4/19/95 . . . . to 800/808-0805
[7